» Articles » PMID: 16796731

Live Bacterial Vaccines--a Review and Identification of Potential Hazards

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2006 Jun 27
PMID 16796731
Citations 67
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The use of live bacteria to induce an immune response to itself or to a carried vaccine component is an attractive vaccine strategy. Advantages of live bacterial vaccines include their mimicry of a natural infection, intrinsic adjuvant properties and their possibility to be administered orally. Derivatives of pathogenic and non-pathogenic food related bacteria are currently being evaluated as live vaccines. However, pathogenic bacteria demands for attenuation to weaken its virulence. The use of bacteria as vaccine delivery vehicles implies construction of recombinant strains that contain the gene cassette encoding the antigen. With the increased knowledge of mucosal immunity and the availability of genetic tools for heterologous gene expression the concept of live vaccine vehicles gains renewed interest. However, administration of live bacterial vaccines poses some risks. In addition, vaccination using recombinant bacteria results in the release of live recombinant organisms into nature. This places these vaccines in the debate on application of genetically modified organisms. In this review we give an overview of live bacterial vaccines on the market and describe the development of new live vaccines with a focus on attenuated bacteria and food-related lactic acid bacteria. Furthermore, we outline the safety concerns and identify the hazards associated with live bacterial vaccines and try to give some suggestions of what to consider during their development.

Citing Articles

Bacillus subtilis surface display technology: applications in bioprocessing and sustainable manufacturing.

Bahrulolum H, Ahmadian G Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod. 2025; 18(1):34.

PMID: 40089785 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-025-02635-4.


Invasions of Host-Associated Microbiome Networks.

Murall C, Abbate J, Touzel M, Allen-Vercoe E, Alizon S, Froissart R Adv Ecol Res. 2024; 57:201-281.

PMID: 39404686 PMC: 7616576. DOI: 10.1016/bs.aecr.2016.11.002.


An unnatural amino acid dependent, conditional Pseudomonas vaccine prevents bacterial infection.

Pigula M, Lai Y, Koh M, Diercks C, Rogers T, Dik D Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):6766.

PMID: 39117651 PMC: 11310302. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-50843-7.


Engineering Toxoplasma gondii secretion systems for intracellular delivery of multiple large therapeutic proteins to neurons.

Bracha S, Johnson H, Pranckevicius N, Catto F, Economides A, Litvinov S Nat Microbiol. 2024; 9(8):2051-2072.

PMID: 39075233 PMC: 11306108. DOI: 10.1038/s41564-024-01750-6.


Mucosal Administration of Surface-Displayed HA1 Induces Protective Immune Responses against Avian Influenza A Virus in Mice.

Huynh D, Chathuranga W, Chathuranga K, Lee J, Kim C J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2023; 34(3):735-745.

PMID: 37915251 PMC: 11016770. DOI: 10.4014/jmb.2307.07040.


References
1.
Pelto L, Isolauri E, Lilius E, Nuutila J, Salminen S . Probiotic bacteria down-regulate the milk-induced inflammatory response in milk-hypersensitive subjects but have an immunostimulatory effect in healthy subjects. Clin Exp Allergy. 1999; 28(12):1474-9. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.1998.00449.x. View

2.
Lindberg A . Vaccination against enteric pathogens: from science to vaccine trials. Curr Opin Microbiol. 1999; 1(1):116-24. DOI: 10.1016/s1369-5274(98)80151-3. View

3.
Mercenier A, Grangette C . Lactic acid bacteria as live vaccines. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2001; 2(1):17-25. View

4.
Oh Y, Kim J, Hwang T, Ko J, Kim J, Yang J . Nasal absorption and biodistribution of plasmid DNA: an alternative route of DNA vaccine delivery. Vaccine. 2001; 19(31):4519-25. DOI: 10.1016/s0264-410x(01)00188-8. View

5.
Shata M, Hone D . Vaccination with a Shigella DNA vaccine vector induces antigen-specific CD8(+) T cells and antiviral protective immunity. J Virol. 2001; 75(20):9665-70. PMC: 114537. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.20.9665-9670.2001. View