» Articles » PMID: 21325071

Close and Stable Relationship Between Proliferation and a Hypoxia Metagene in Aromatase Inhibitor-treated ER-positive Breast Cancer

Overview
Journal Clin Cancer Res
Specialty Oncology
Date 2011 Feb 18
PMID 21325071
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The majority of breast cancer patients who have estrogen receptor positive (ER(+)) tumors whose proliferation is reduced after estrogen deprivation by aromatase inhibitors (AI). This study investigates any link between proliferation and hypoxia, a major determinant of tumor biology, and defines the effect of estrogen deprivation on hypoxia-associated genes.

Methods: Genome-wide expression profiles were obtained from tumor biopsies from 81 ER(+) postmenopausal patients, before and after 2 weeks' anastrozole treatment. A hypoxia metagene was developed by identifying genes clustered with classical hypoxia-regulated genes, excluding those associated with proliferation. Proliferation was measured by Ki67 and a proliferation metagene derived from two published breast cancer data sets.

Results: Hypoxia and proliferation metagenes were associated at baseline (Pearson correlation coefficient, r = 0.67, P < 10(-4)) and after 2 weeks (r = 0.71, P < 10(-4)). Hypoxia metagene at baseline was associated with 2-week Ki67 (r = 0.43, P = 0.0002) and more weakly with poor 2-week Ki67 change consistent with a weak association with AI resistance. Hypoxia metagene was significantly downregulated with AI. This downregulation was significantly associated with change in the proliferation metagene and with Ki67 but, importantly, not with the substantial change in expression of classical estrogen-dependent genes.

Conclusions: Hypoxia metagene is closely associated with proliferation before and after AI treatment. The downregulation of hypoxia metagene after AI therapy is most likely the result of changes in proliferation. There may be a weak effect of hypoxia metagene on de novo resistance to AIs. These findings are important to consider in coapplication of antiproliferative agents with antiangiogenic or antihypoxia agents.

Citing Articles

Defining hypoxia in cancer: A landmark evaluation of hypoxia gene expression signatures.

Di Giovannantonio M, Hartley F, Elshenawy B, Barberis A, Hudson D, Shafique H Cell Genom. 2025; 5(2):100764.

PMID: 39892389 PMC: 11872601. DOI: 10.1016/j.xgen.2025.100764.


Clinical relevance and therapeutic predictive ability of hypoxia biomarkers in head and neck cancer tumour models.

Lee T, Singleton D, Harms J, Lu M, McManaway S, Lai A Mol Oncol. 2024; 18(8):1885-1903.

PMID: 38426642 PMC: 11306523. DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13620.


Molecular profiling of aromatase inhibitor sensitive and resistant ER+HER2- postmenopausal breast cancers.

Schuster E, Lopez-Knowles E, Alataki A, Zabaglo L, Folkerd E, Evans D Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):4017.

PMID: 37419892 PMC: 10328947. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-39613-z.


Pan-cancer analysis of tissue and single-cell HIF-pathway activation using a conserved gene signature.

Lombardi O, Li R, Halim S, Choudhry H, Ratcliffe P, Mole D Cell Rep. 2022; 41(7):111652.

PMID: 36384128 PMC: 9869179. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111652.


Intratumoral heterogeneity and hypoxia gene expression signatures: Is a single biopsy adequate?.

Lukovic J, Han K, Pintilie M, Chaudary N, Hill R, Fyles A Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2019; 19:110-115.

PMID: 31650046 PMC: 6804682. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2019.09.006.