» Articles » PMID: 21303017

Spatial Release from Masking in Normal-hearing Children and Children Who Use Hearing Aids

Overview
Journal J Acoust Soc Am
Date 2011 Feb 10
PMID 21303017
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Listening to speech in competing sounds poses a major difficulty for children with impaired hearing. This study aimed to determine the ability of children (3-12 yr of age) to use spatial separation between target speech and competing babble to improve speech intelligibility. Fifty-eight children (31 with normal hearing and 27 with impaired hearing who use bilateral hearing aids) were assessed by word and sentence material. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured with speech presented from 0° azimuth, and competing babble from either 0° or ±90° azimuth. Spatial release from masking (SRM) was defined as the difference between SRTs measured with co-located speech and babble and SRTs measured with spatially separated speech and babble. On average, hearing-impaired children attained near-normal performance when speech and babble originated from the frontal source, but performed poorer than their normal-hearing peers when babble was spatially separated from target speech. On average, normal-hearing children obtained an SRM of 3 dB whereas children with hearing loss did not demonstrate SRM. Results suggest that hearing-impaired children may need enhancement in signal-to-noise ratio to hear speech in difficult listening conditions as well as normal-hearing children.

Citing Articles

Speech Recognition and Spatial Hearing in Young Adults With Down Syndrome: Relationships With Hearing Thresholds and Auditory Working Memory.

Anshu K, Kristensen K, Godar S, Zhou X, Hartley S, Litovsky R Ear Hear. 2024; 45(6):1568-1584.

PMID: 39090791 PMC: 11493531. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001549.


Development and Validation of the Spatial Separation Sentence Test in Kannada.

Hermon A, Ganapathy K, Palaniswamy H, Muthu A J Audiol Otol. 2024; 28(3):228-235.

PMID: 38685832 PMC: 11273185. DOI: 10.7874/jao.2023.00325.


Speech, language, functional communication, psychosocial outcomes and QOL in school-age children with congenital unilateral hearing loss.

Cupples L, Ching T, Hou S Front Pediatr. 2024; 12:1282952.

PMID: 38510079 PMC: 10950935. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2024.1282952.


Children's use of spatial and visual cues for release from perceptual masking.

Lalonde K, Peng Z, Halverson D, Dwyer G J Acoust Soc Am. 2024; 155(2):1559-1569.

PMID: 38393738 PMC: 10890829. DOI: 10.1121/10.0024766.


Children using a unilateral cochlear implant and contralateral hearing aid: bimodal hearing outcomes when one ear is outside the UK (NICE 2009) audiological criteria for cochlear implantation - a single site case-control study.

Bruce I, Schaefer S, Kluk K, Nichani J, ODriscoll M, Rajai A BMJ Open. 2023; 13(6):e071168.

PMID: 37339839 PMC: 10314481. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071168.


References
1.
Johnstone P, Litovsky R . Effect of masker type and age on speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking in children and adults. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006; 120(4):2177-89. PMC: 2644459. DOI: 10.1121/1.2225416. View

2.
King A, Kacelnik O, Schnupp J, Parsons C, Moore D . How plastic is spatial hearing?. Audiol Neurootol. 2001; 6(4):182-6. DOI: 10.1159/000046829. View

3.
Neher T, Behrens T, Carlile S, Jin C, Kragelund L, Petersen A . Benefit from spatial separation of multiple talkers in bilateral hearing-aid users: Effects of hearing loss, age, and cognition. Int J Audiol. 2009; 48(11):758-74. DOI: 10.3109/14992020903079332. View

4.
Scollie S, Ching T, Seewald R, Dillon H, Britton L, Steinberg J . Evaluation of the NAL-NL1 and DSL v4.1 prescriptions for children: Preference in real world use. Int J Audiol. 2010; 49 Suppl 1:S49-63. DOI: 10.3109/14992020903148038. View

5.
Allen P, Wightman F . Psychometric functions for children's detection of tones in noise. J Speech Hear Res. 1994; 37(1):205-15. DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3701.205. View