» Articles » PMID: 20109089

Evaluation of the NAL-NL1 and DSL V4.1 Prescriptions for Children: Preference in Real World Use

Overview
Journal Int J Audiol
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Date 2010 Jan 30
PMID 20109089
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This paper reports real world preferences of children in a double-blind, cross-over trial comparing NAL-NL1 and DSL v.4.1 prescriptions. Twenty-four children wore digital WDRC hearing aids at each site (Australia, Canada). Multi-memory hearing aids provided the NAL and DSL programs in each of two memories. Diaries were completed during two counterbalanced trials, providing overall preference, situational preference, and preference comments. Ratings were reliable, and situational preferences factored into quiet/low level situations versus noisy/reverberant/high level situations. Children at both sites used DSL v4.1 for hearing low level speech, or when they wanted to hear loudly and clearly. Children used NAL-NL1 when they wished to hear sounds at a lower level, or to reduce background noise. Children expressed strong preferences for having the choice of both programs. Canadian children were more likely to prefer DSL than were the Australian children. Factors such as listening environment and prior listening experience are discussed in interpreting these findings.

Citing Articles

Functional outcomes for speech-in-noise intelligibility of NAL-NL2 and DSL v.5 prescriptive fitting rules in hearing aid users.

Portelli D, Loteta S, Ciodaro F, Salvago P, Galletti C, Freni L Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024; 281(6):3227-3235.

PMID: 38546852 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-024-08587-z.


Listening Preferences of New Adult Hearing Aid Users: A Registered, Double-Blind, Randomized, Mixed-Methods Clinical Trial of Initial Versus Real-Ear Fit.

Almufarrij I, Dillon H, Adams B, Greval A, Munro K Trends Hear. 2023; 27:23312165231189596.

PMID: 37942535 PMC: 10637150. DOI: 10.1177/23312165231189596.


Task-Dependent Effects of Signal Audibility for Processing Speech: Comparing Performance With NAL-NL2 and DSL v5 Hearing Aid Prescriptions at Threshold and at Suprathreshold Levels in 9- to 17-Year-Olds With Hearing Loss.

Pittman A, Stewart E Trends Hear. 2023; 27:23312165231177509.

PMID: 37254534 PMC: 10236245. DOI: 10.1177/23312165231177509.


Is the outcome of fitting hearing aids to adults affected by whether an audiogram-based prescription formula is individually applied? A systematic review protocol.

Almufarrij I, Dillon H, Munro K BMJ Open. 2021; 11(8):e045899.

PMID: 34341039 PMC: 8330563. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045899.


Does Probe-Tube Verification of Real-Ear Hearing Aid Amplification Characteristics Improve Outcomes in Adults? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Almufarrij I, Dillon H, Munro K Trends Hear. 2021; 25:2331216521999563.

PMID: 33899603 PMC: 8083001. DOI: 10.1177/2331216521999563.