» Articles » PMID: 21286986

Levels of Coding in Picture-picture Comparison Tasks

Overview
Journal Mem Cognit
Specialty Psychology
Date 2011 Feb 3
PMID 21286986
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Two experiments are reported in which subjects had to match pairs of pictures of objects. "Same" pairs could be either identical (Ps), pictures of different views of the same object (Pv), or pictures of different objects having the same name (Pd). With line drawings as stimuli, RTs for Condition Ps were shorter than for Condition Pv, which in turn were shorter than for Condition Pd. Visual similarity had no effect on Pd RTs. However, in Experiment II, where photographs of objects with high-frequency (HF) and low-frequency (LF) names were used, no difference was found between Conditions Ps(HF), Ps(LF) and Condition Pv(HF); and no difference occurred between Conditions Pd(HF), Pd(LF) and Condition Pv(LF), the latter set of conditions being associated with longer RTs than the former. This pattern of results was found with both a .25-sec and a 2-sec ISI. The results are discussed in terms of the levels of coding involved in processing information from picture stimuli. It is concluded that at least two levels are involved in matching photographs of real objects (an object-code level and a nonvisual semantic code level), while a third level may be used in matching tasks involving stylized line drawings (a picture-code level).

Citing Articles

Picture perfect: A stimulus set of 225 pairs of matched clipart and photographic images normed by Mechanical Turk and laboratory participants.

Saryazdi R, Bannon J, Rodrigues A, Klammer C, Chambers C Behav Res Methods. 2018; 50(6):2498-2510.

PMID: 29520634 PMC: 6267513. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-018-1028-5.


Event-Related Potential Effects of Object Repetition Depend on Attention and Part-Whole Configuration.

Gosling A, Thoma V, De Fockert J, Richardson-Klavehn A Front Hum Neurosci. 2016; 10:478.

PMID: 27721749 PMC: 5034651. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00478.


Different Loci of Semantic Interference in Picture Naming vs. Word-Picture Matching Tasks.

Harvey D, Schnur T Front Psychol. 2016; 7:710.

PMID: 27242621 PMC: 4865493. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00710.


Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects.

Tarr M Psychon Bull Rev. 2013; 2(1):55-82.

PMID: 24203590 DOI: 10.3758/BF03214412.


Earlier development of analytical than holistic object recognition in adolescence.

Wakui E, Juttner M, Petters D, Kaur S, Hummel J, Davidoff J PLoS One. 2013; 8(4):e61041.

PMID: 23577188 PMC: 3618112. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061041.


References
1.
Klatzky R, Stoy A . Using visual codes for comparisons of pictures. Mem Cognit. 2013; 2(4):727-36. DOI: 10.3758/BF03198148. View

2.
Frost N . Encoding and retrieval in visual memory tasks. J Exp Psychol. 1972; 95(2):317-26. DOI: 10.1037/h0033636. View

3.
Wingfield A . Effects of frequency on identification and naming of objects. Am J Psychol. 1968; 81(2):226-34. View

4.
Bartram D . The effects of familiarity and practice on naming pictures of objects. Mem Cognit. 2013; 1(2):101-5. DOI: 10.3758/BF03198077. View

5.
Klatzky R . Visual and verbal coding of laterally presented pictures. J Exp Psychol. 1972; 96(2):439-48. DOI: 10.1037/h0033613. View