» Articles » PMID: 21268239

Hydrostatic Pressure Independently Increases Elastin and Collagen Co-expression in Small-diameter Engineered Arterial Constructs

Overview
Date 2011 Jan 27
PMID 21268239
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Prior studies have demonstrated that smooth muscle cell (SMC) proliferation, migration, and extracellular matrix production increase with hydrostatic pressure in vitro. We have engineered highly compliant small-diameter arterial constructs by culturing primary adult baboon arterial SMCs under pulsatile perfusion on tubular, porous, elastomeric scaffolds composed of poly(glycerol sebacate) (PGS). This study investigates the effect of hydrostatic pressure on the biological and mechanical properties of PGS-based engineered arterial constructs. Pressure was raised using a downstream needle valve during perfusion while preserving flow rate and pulsatility, and constructs were evaluated by pressure-diameter testing and biochemical assays for collagen and elastin. Pressurized constructs contained half as much insoluble elastin as baboon common carotid arteries but were significantly less compliant, while constructs cultured at low hydrostatic pressure contained one-third as much insoluble elastin as baboon carotids and were similar in compliance. Hydrostatic pressure significantly increased construct burst pressure, collagen and insoluble elastin content, and soluble elastin concentration in culture medium. All arteries and constructs exhibited elastic recovery during pressure cycling. Hydrostatic pressure did not appear to affect radial distribution of SMCs, collagens I and III, and elastin. These results provide insights into the control of engineered smooth muscle tissue properties using hydrostatic pressure.

Citing Articles

Towards human organ generation using interspecies blastocyst complementation: Challenges and perspectives for therapy.

Sarmah H, Sawada A, Hwang Y, Miura A, Shimamura Y, Tanaka J Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023; 11:1070560.

PMID: 36743411 PMC: 9893295. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1070560.


Challenges and Possibilities of Cell-Based Tissue-Engineered Vascular Grafts.

Saito J, Kaneko M, Ishikawa Y, Yokoyama U Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2022; 2021:1532103.

PMID: 36285145 PMC: 9494692. DOI: 10.34133/2021/1532103.


Formation of pressurizable hydrogel-based vascular tissue models by selective gelation in composite PDMS channels.

Fukushi M, Kinoshita K, Yamada M, Yajima Y, Utoh R, Seki M RSC Adv. 2022; 9(16):9136-9144.

PMID: 35517655 PMC: 9062067. DOI: 10.1039/c9ra00257j.


Polyglycerol Hyperbranched Polyesters: Synthesis, Properties and Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Applications.

Zamboulis A, Nakiou E, Christodoulou E, Bikiaris D, Kontonasaki E, Liverani L Int J Mol Sci. 2019; 20(24).

PMID: 31835372 PMC: 6940955. DOI: 10.3390/ijms20246210.


Arterial graft with elastic layer structure grown from cells.

Yokoyama U, Tonooka Y, Koretake R, Akimoto T, Gonda Y, Saito J Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):140.

PMID: 28273941 PMC: 5428065. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-00237-1.


References
1.
Abbott W, Megerman J, HASSON J, Litalien G, Warnock D . Effect of compliance mismatch on vascular graft patency. J Vasc Surg. 1987; 5(2):376-82. View

2.
Hoerstrup S, Kadner A, Breymann C, Maurus C, Guenter C, Sodian R . Living, autologous pulmonary artery conduits tissue engineered from human umbilical cord cells. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002; 74(1):46-52; discussion 52. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03649-4. View

3.
Wang Y, Kim Y, Langer R . In vivo degradation characteristics of poly(glycerol sebacate). J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003; 66(1):192-7. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.10534. View

4.
Xing Y, He Z, Warnock J, Hilbert S, Yoganathan A . Effects of constant static pressure on the biological properties of porcine aortic valve leaflets. Ann Biomed Eng. 2004; 32(4):555-62. DOI: 10.1023/b:abme.0000019175.12013.8f. View

5.
Trubel W, Schima H, Moritz A, Raderer F, Windisch A, Ullrich R . Compliance mismatch and formation of distal anastomotic intimal hyperplasia in externally stiffened and lumen-adapted venous grafts. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1995; 10(4):415-23. DOI: 10.1016/s1078-5884(05)80163-7. View