» Articles » PMID: 21244602

The Impact of Cavernosal Nerve Preservation on Continence After Robotic Radical Prostatectomy

Overview
Journal BJU Int
Specialty Urology
Date 2011 Jan 20
PMID 21244602
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: • To evaluate associations between baseline characteristics, nerve-sparing (NS) status and return of continence, as a relationship may exist between return to continence and preservation of the neurovascular bundles for potency during radical prostatectomy (RP).

Patients And Methods: • The study included 592 consecutive robotic RPs completed between 2002 and 2007. • All data were entered prospectively into an electronic database. • Continence data (defined as zero pads) was collected using self-administered validated questionnaires. • Baseline characteristics (age, International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF-5] score, American Urological Association symptom score, body mass index [BMI], clinical T-stage, Gleason score, and prostate-specific antigen level), NS status and learning curve were retrospectively evaluated for association with overall continence at 1, 3 and 12 months after RP using univariate and multivariable methods. • Any patient taking preoperative phosphodiesterase inhibitors was excluded from the postoperative analysis.

Results: • Complete data were available for 537 of 592 patients (91%). • Continence rates at 12 months after RP were 89.2%, 88.9% and 84.8% for bilateral NS, unilateral NS and non-NS respectively (P= 0.56). • In multivariable analysis age, IIEF-5 score and BMI were significant independent predictors of continence. • CavernosalNS status did not significantly affect continence after adjusting for other co-variables.

Conclusion: • After careful multivariable analysis of baseline characteristics age, IIEF-5 score and BMI affected continence in a statistically significant fashion. This suggests that baseline factors and not the physical preservation of the cavernosal nerves predict overall return to continence.

Citing Articles

Is there any difference in urinary continence between bilateral and unilateral nerve sparing during radical prostatectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xiang P, Du Z, Guan D, Yan W, Wang M, Guo D World J Surg Oncol. 2024; 22(1):66.

PMID: 38395861 PMC: 10885481. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-024-03340-6.


Impact of modified bladder neck suspension on early recovery of continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

Moon H, Rhew S, Yoon C, Kwon H, Park Y, Lee J J Robot Surg. 2023; 17(5):2279-2285.

PMID: 37336839 PMC: 10492743. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01640-9.


Impact of surgically maximized versus native membranous urethral length on 30-day and long-term pad-free continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Ko Y, Huynh L, See K, Lall C, Skarecky D, Ahlering T Prostate Int. 2020; 8(2):55-61.

PMID: 32647641 PMC: 7336015. DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2019.12.005.


Significant association between urethral length measured by magnetic resonance imaging and urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Kitamura K, China T, Kanayama M, Nagata M, Isotani S, Wakumoto Y Prostate Int. 2019; 7(2):54-59.

PMID: 31384606 PMC: 6664308. DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2018.06.003.


Appropriate preoperative membranous urethral length predicts recovery of urinary continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Ikarashi D, Kato Y, Kanehira M, Takata R, Ito A, Onoda M World J Surg Oncol. 2018; 16(1):224.

PMID: 30445961 PMC: 6240250. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-018-1523-2.


References
1.
Matsunaga G, Ahlering T, Skarecky D . Update on robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. ScientificWorldJournal. 2007; 6:2542-52. PMC: 5944182. DOI: 10.1100/tsw.2006.394. View

2.
Nelson C, Montie J, McGuire E, Wedemeyer G, Wei J . Intraoperative nerve stimulation with measurement of urethral sphincter pressure changes during radical retropubic prostatectomy: a feasibility study. J Urol. 2003; 169(6):2225-8. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000058213.15524.90. View

3.
Shikanov S, Desai V, Razmaria A, Zagaja G, Shalhav A . Robotic radical prostatectomy for elderly patients: probability of achieving continence and potency 1 year after surgery. J Urol. 2010; 183(5):1803-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.01.016. View

4.
Stein R . The case for posterior musculofascial plate reconstruction in robotic prostatectomy. Urology. 2009; 74(3):489-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.08.521. View

5.
Michl U, Lange D, Graefen M, Huland H . Re: Intraoperative nerve stimulation with measurement of urethral sphincter pressure changes during radical retropubic prostatectomy: a feasibility study. C. P. Nelson, J. E. Montie, E. J. McGuire, G. Wedemeyer and J.T. Wei. J Urol, 169: 2225-2228,.... J Urol. 2003; 171(1):359. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000102220.88548.77. View