Is There Any Difference in Urinary Continence Between Bilateral and Unilateral Nerve Sparing During Radical Prostatectomy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview

Journal World J Surg Oncol

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialties General Surgery
Oncology

Date 2024 Feb 23

PMID 38395861

Authors

Peng Xiang

Zhen Du

Di Guan

Wei Yan

Mingdong Wang

Danyang Guo

Dan Liu

Yuexin Liu

Hao Ping

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Context: In men with prostate cancer, urinary incontinence is one of the most common long-term side effects of radical prostatectomy (RP). The recovery of urinary continence in patients is positively influenced by preserving the integrity of the neurovascular bundles (NVBs). However, it is still unclear if bilateral nerve sparing (BNS) is superior to unilateral nerve sparing (UNS) in terms of post-RP urinary continence. The aim of this study is to systematically compare the differences in post-RP urinary continence outcomes between BNS and UNS.

Methods: The electronic databases of PubMed and Web of Science were comprehensively searched. The search period was up to May 31, 2023. English language articles comparing urinary continence outcomes of patients undergoing BNS and UNS radical prostatectomy were included. Meta-analyses were performed to calculate pooled relative risk (RR) estimates with 95% confidence intervals for urinary continence in BNS and UNS groups at selected follow-up intervals using a random-effects model. Sensitivity analyses were performed in prospective studies and robotic-assisted RP studies.

Results: A meta-analysis was conducted using data from 26,961 participants in fifty-seven studies. A meta-analysis demonstrated that BNS improved the urinary continence rate compared to UNS at all selected follow-up points. RRs were 1.36 (1.14-1.63; p = 0.0007) at ≤ 1.5 months (mo), 1.28 (1.08-1.51; p = 0.005) at 3-4 mo, 1.12 (1.03-1.22; p = 0.01) at 6 mo, 1.08 (1.05-1.12; p < 0.00001) at 12 mo, and 1.07 (1.00-1.13; p = 0.03) at ≥ 24 mo, respectively. With the extension of the follow-up time, RRs decreased from 1.36 to 1.07, showing a gradual downward trend. Pooled estimates were largely heterogeneous. Similar findings were obtained through sensitivity analyses of prospective studies and robotic-assisted RP studies.

Conclusion: The findings of this meta-analysis demonstrate that BNS yields superior outcomes in terms of urinary continence compared to UNS, with these advantages being sustained for a minimum duration of 24 months. It may be due to the real effect of saving the nerves involved. Future high-quality studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Citing Articles

Short-Term Urinary Incontinence After Radical Prostatectomy Is Still Based on Patients' Age, Nerve-Sparing Approach, and Surgical-Experience, Despite the Higher-Use of Robotic Surgery in 2022 Compared to 2016 Real-World Results of a Large....

Pullen L, Naumann M, Krafft U, Pullen F, Mahmoud O, Al-Nader M Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2024; 7(12):e70092.

PMID: 39731578 PMC: 11681802. DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.70092.

Recent Advances in Diagnosing and Treating Post-Prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence.

Li Y, Xiao Y, Shen Z, Yang S, Li Z, Liao H Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 31(12):8444-8459.

PMID: 39217264 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16110-1.

Integrating plasma exosomal miRNAs, ultrasound radiomics and tPSA for the diagnosis and prediction of early prostate cancer: a multi-center study.

Wang C, Zhou C, Zhang Y, He H, Wang D, Lv H Clin Transl Oncol. 2024; .

PMID: 39196498 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03682-3.

References

Hinata N, Murakami G, Miyake H, Tanaka K, Abe S, Fujimiya M . Urethral sphincter fatigue after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: descriptive questionnaire-based study and anatomic basis. Urology. 2014; 84(1):144-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.01.046. View

Morozov A, Barret E, Veneziano D, Grigoryan V, Salomon G, Fokin I . A systematic review of nerve-sparing surgery for high-risk prostate cancer. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021; 73(3):283-291. DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.20.04178-8. View

Holze S, Mende M, Healy K, Koehler N, Gansera L, Truss M . Comparison of various continence definitions in a large group of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: a multicentre, prospective study. BMC Urol. 2019; 19(1):70. PMC: 6659208. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-019-0500-6. View

Sammon J, Sharma P, Trinh Q, Ghani K, Sukumar S, Menon M . Predictors of immediate continence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2012; 27(4):442-6. DOI: 10.1089/end.2012.0312. View

Albayrak S, Canguven O, Goktas C, Cetinel C, Horuz R, Aydemir H . Radical perineal prostatectomy and early continence: outcomes after 120 cases. Int Braz J Urol. 2011; 36(6):693-9. DOI: 10.1590/s1677-55382010000600007. View

Heesakkers J, Farag F, Bauer R, Sandhu J, Ridder D, Stenzl A . Pathophysiology and Contributing Factors in Postprostatectomy Incontinence: A Review. Eur Urol. 2016; 71(6):936-944. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.09.031. View

Kadono Y, Ueno S, Kadomoto S, Iwamoto H, Takezawa Y, Nakashima K . Use of preoperative factors including urodynamic evaluations and nerve-sparing status for predicting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Nerve-sparing technique contributes to the reduction of postprostatectomy.... Neurourol Urodyn. 2015; 35(8):1034-1039. DOI: 10.1002/nau.22877. View

Steineck G, Bjartell A, Hugosson J, Axen E, Carlsson S, Stranne J . Degree of preservation of the neurovascular bundles during radical prostatectomy and urinary continence 1 year after surgery. Eur Urol. 2014; 67(3):559-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.011. View

Berry T, Tepera C, Staneck D, Barone B, Lance R, Fabrizio M . Is there correlation of nerve-sparing status and return to baseline urinary function after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy?. J Endourol. 2009; 23(3):489-93. DOI: 10.1089/end.2008.0222. View

10.

El-Hakim A, Al-Hathal N, Al-Qaoud T, Gagne G, Larocque S, Denis R . Novel uroflow stop test at time of catheter removal is a strong predictor of early urinary continence recovery following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a pilot study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013; 34(1):60-4. DOI: 10.1002/nau.22481. View

11.

Theissen L, Preisser F, Wenzel M, Humke C, Roos F, Kluth L . Very Early Continence After Radical Prostatectomy and Its Influencing Factors. Front Surg. 2019; 6:60. PMC: 6823177. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2019.00060. View

12.

Asimakopoulos A, Topazio L, De Angelis M, Agro E, Pastore A, Fuschi A . Retzius-sparing versus standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized comparison on immediate continence rates. Surg Endosc. 2018; 33(7):2187-2196. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6499-z. View

13.

Kovacik V, Maciak M, Balaz V, Babela J, Kubas V, Bujdak P . Advanced Reconstruction of Vesicourethral Support (ARVUS) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: first independent evaluation and review of other factors influencing 1 year continence outcomes. World J Urol. 2019; 38(8):1933-1941. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02975-5. View

14.

Chung J, Kim S, Kang H, Ha Y, Choi S, Lee J . Efficacy of modified radical prostatectomy technique for recovery of urinary incontinence in high-grade prostate cancer. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020; 72(5):605-614. DOI: 10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03633-4. View

15.

Choi W, Freire M, Soukup J, Yin L, Lipsitz S, Carvas F . Nerve-sparing technique and urinary control after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. World J Urol. 2010; 29(1):21-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-010-0601-z. View

16.

Shikanov S, Desai V, Razmaria A, Zagaja G, Shalhav A . Robotic radical prostatectomy for elderly patients: probability of achieving continence and potency 1 year after surgery. J Urol. 2010; 183(5):1803-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.01.016. View

17.

Greco F, Hoda M, Wagner S, Reichelt O, Inferrera A, Magno C . Bilateral vs unilateral laparoscopic intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of surgical and functional outcomes in 457 patients. BJU Int. 2010; 108(4):583-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09836.x. View

18.

Sessa F, Nicoletti R, Pecoraro A, Polverino P, Rivetti A, Conte F . Urinary Continence Recovery after Robotic Radical Prostatectomy without Anterior or Posterior Reconstruction: Experience from a Tertiary Referral Center. J Clin Med. 2023; 12(4). PMC: 9962972. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12041358. View

19.

Feng T, Heulitt G, Lee J, Liao M, Li H, Porter J . Randomised comparison of techniques for control of the dorsal venous complex during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2020; 126(5):586-594. DOI: 10.1111/bju.15133. View

20.

Dalkin B, Christopher B, Shawler D . Health related quality of life outcomes after radical prostatectomy: attention to study design and the patient-based importance of single-surgeon studies. Urol Oncol. 2006; 24(1):28-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2005.05.009. View