» Articles » PMID: 21232655

Molecular Imaging in Myeloma Precursor Disease

Overview
Journal Semin Hematol
Specialty Hematology
Date 2011 Jan 15
PMID 21232655
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM) is consistently preceded by its pre-malignant states, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and/or smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM). By definition, precursor conditions do not exhibit end-organ disease (anemia, hypercalcemia, renal failure, skeletal lytic lesions, or a combination of these). However, new imaging methods are demonstrating that some patients in the MGUS or SMM category are exhibiting early signs of MM. Although MGUS/SMM patients are currently defined as low-risk versus high-risk based on clinical markers, we currently lack the ability to predict the individual patient's risk of progression from MGUS/SMM to MM. Given that the presence of gross lytic bone lesions is a hallmark of MM, it is reasonable to believe that less severe bone changes defined by more sensitive imaging may be predictive of MM progression. Indeed, since bone disease is such an essential aspect of MM, imaging techniques directed at the detection of early bone lesions, have the potential to become increasingly more useful in the setting of MGUS/SMM. Current guidelines for the radiological assessment of MM still recommend the traditional skeletal survey, although its limitations are well documented, especially in early phases of the disease when radiographs can significantly underestimate the extent of bone lesions and bone marrow involvement. Newer, more advanced imaging modalities, with higher sensitivities, including whole-body low-dose computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET) are being employed. Also various imaging techniques have been used to provide an assessment of bone involvement and identify extra-osseous disease. This review emphasizes the current state of the art and emerging imaging methods, which may help to better define high-risk versus low-risk MGUS/SMM. Ultimately, improved imaging could allow more tailored clinical management, and, most likely play an important role in the development of future treatment strategies for high-risk precursor disease.

Citing Articles

Current Status and Future of Artificial Intelligence in MM Imaging: A Systematic Review.

Alipour E, Pooyan A, Zadeh F, Darbandi A, Bonaffini P, Chalian M Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(21).

PMID: 37958267 PMC: 10650900. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13213372.


Whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient values as prognostic factors in multiple myeloma.

Costachescu D, Ionita I, Borsi E, Potre O, Potre C, Navolan D Exp Ther Med. 2021; 22(2):827.

PMID: 34149873 PMC: 8200804. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2021.10259.


Diagnostic performance of F-FDG-PET/CT compared to standard skeletal survey for detecting bone destruction in smouldering multiple myeloma: time to move forward.

Hill E, Mena E, Morrison C, Dew A, Choyke P, Lindenberg L Br J Haematol. 2020; 193(1):125-128.

PMID: 32966607 PMC: 9310660. DOI: 10.1111/bjh.17088.


Differential diagnostic value of F-FDG PET/CT in osteolytic lesions.

Li X, Wu N, Zhang W, Liu Y, Ming Y J Bone Oncol. 2020; 24:100302.

PMID: 32760643 PMC: 7393436. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbo.2020.100302.


Whole-body MRI, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and diffusion-weighted imaging for the staging of multiple myeloma.

Dutoit J, Verstraete K Skeletal Radiol. 2017; 46(6):733-750.

PMID: 28289855 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-017-2609-6.


References
1.
Durie B . The role of anatomic and functional staging in myeloma: description of Durie/Salmon plus staging system. Eur J Cancer. 2006; 42(11):1539-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.11.037. View

2.
Pepe J, Petrucci M, Nofroni I, Fassino V, Diacinti D, Romagnoli E . Lumbar bone mineral density as the major factor determining increased prevalence of vertebral fractures in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Br J Haematol. 2006; 134(5):485-90. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2006.06217.x. View

3.
Hillengass J, Zechmann C, Bauerle T, Wagner-Gund B, Heiss C, Benner A . Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging identifies a subgroup of patients with asymptomatic monoclonal plasma cell disease and pathologic microcirculation. Clin Cancer Res. 2009; 15(9):3118-25. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2310. View

4.
Fenchel M, Konaktchieva M, Weisel K, Kraus S, Claussen C, Horger M . Response assessment in patients with multiple myeloma during antiangiogenic therapy using arterial spin labeling and diffusion-weighted imaging: a feasibility study. Acad Radiol. 2010; 17(11):1326-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.08.002. View

5.
Horger M, Claussen C, Bross-Bach U, Vonthein R, Trabold T, Heuschmid M . Whole-body low-dose multidetector row-CT in the diagnosis of multiple myeloma: an alternative to conventional radiography. Eur J Radiol. 2005; 54(2):289-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.04.015. View