» Articles » PMID: 21220168

Piglets Produced from in Vivo Blastocysts Vitrified Using the Cryologic Vitrification Method (solid Surface Vitrification) and a Sealed Storage Container

Overview
Journal Theriogenology
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2011 Jan 12
PMID 21220168
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objective was to develop a simple successful porcine cryopreservation protocol that prevented contact between embryos and liquid nitrogen, avoiding potential contamination risks. In vivo-derived blastocysts were collected surgically from donor pigs, and two porcine embryo vitrification protocols (one used centrifugation to polarize intracytoplasmic lipids, whereas the other did not) were compared using the Cryologic Vitrification Method (CVM), which used solid surface vitrification. The CVM allowed embryos to be vitrified, without any contact between embryos and liquid nitrogen. Both protocols resulted in similar in vitro survival rates (90% and 94%) and cell number (89 ± 5 and 99 ± 5) after 48 h in vitro culture of vitrified and warmed blastocysts. The protocol that did not use centrifugation was selected for continued use. To protect vitrified embryos from contact with liquid nitrogen and potential contamination during storage, a sealed outer container was developed. Use of this sealed outer container did not affect in vitro survival of cryopreserved blastocysts. In vivo blastocysts (n = 151) were collected, vitrified, and stored using the selected protocol and sealed container. These embryos were subsequently warmed and transferred to six recipients; five became pregnant and farrowed a total of 26 piglets. This embryo vitrification method allowed porcine embryos to be successfully vitrified and stored without any contact with liquid nitrogen.

Citing Articles

Transcriptome Analysis of mRNAs and Long Non-Coding RNAs During Subsequent Embryo Development of Porcine Cloned Zygotes After Vitrification.

Xiang D, Jia B, Guo J, Shao Q, Hong Q, Wei H Front Genet. 2022; 12:753327.

PMID: 34976007 PMC: 8718616. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.753327.


Effective vitrification and warming of porcine embryos using a pH-stable, chemically defined medium.

Cuello C, Martinez C, Nohalez A, Parrilla I, Roca J, Gil M Sci Rep. 2016; 6:33915.

PMID: 27666294 PMC: 5036199. DOI: 10.1038/srep33915.


A comparison of different vitrification devices and the effect of blastocoele collapse on the cryosurvival of in vitro produced porcine embryos.

Bartolac L, Lowe J, Koustas G, Sjoblom C, Grupen C J Reprod Dev. 2015; 61(6):525-31.

PMID: 26211782 PMC: 4685218. DOI: 10.1262/jrd.2015-065.


Nonsurgical deep uterine transfer of vitrified, in vivo-derived, porcine embryos is as effective as the default surgical approach.

Martinez E, Martinez C, Nohalez A, Sanchez-Osorio J, Vazquez J, Roca J Sci Rep. 2015; 5:10587.

PMID: 26030839 PMC: 4450750. DOI: 10.1038/srep10587.


Closed vitrification of mouse oocytes using the CryoLogic vitrification method: A modification that improves developmental competence.

Jo J, Jee B, Suh C, Kim S Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2014; 40(4):148-54.

PMID: 24505560 PMC: 3913893. DOI: 10.5653/cerm.2013.40.4.148.