» Articles » PMID: 21212364

Knee Articular Cartilage Damage in Osteoarthritis: Analysis of MR Image Biomarker Reproducibility in ACRIN-PA 4001 Multicenter Trial

Overview
Journal Radiology
Specialty Radiology
Date 2011 Jan 8
PMID 21212364
Citations 79
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To prospectively determine the reproducibility of quantitative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging biomarkers of the morphology and composition (spin lattice relaxation time in rotating frame [T1-ρ], T2) of knee cartilage in a multicenter multivendor trial involving patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and asymptomatic control subjects.

Materials And Methods: This study was HIPAA compliant and approved by the institutional review committees of the participating sites, with written informed consent obtained from all participants. Fifty subjects from five sites who were deemed to have normal knee joints (n = 18), mild OA (n = 16), or moderate OA (n = 16) on the basis of Kellgren-Lawrence scores were enrolled. Each participant underwent four sequential 3-T knee MR imaging examinations with use of the same imager and with 2-63 days (median, 18 days) separating the first and last examinations. Water-excited three-dimensional T1-weighted gradient-echo imaging, T1-ρ imaging, and T2 mapping of cartilage in the axial and coronal planes were performed. Biomarker reproducibility was determined by using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and root-mean-square coefficients of variation (RMS CVs, expressed as percentages).

Results: Morphometric biomarkers had high reproducibility, with ICCs of 0.989 or greater and RMS CVs lower than 4%. The largest differences between the healthy subjects and the patients with radiographically detected knee OA were those in T1-ρ values, but precision errors were relatively large. Reproducibility of T1-ρ values was higher in the thicker patellar cartilage (ICC range, 0.86-0.93; RMS CV range, 14%-18%) than in the femorotibial joints (ICC range, 0.20-0.84; RMS CV range, 7%-19%). Good to high reproducibility of T2 was observed, with ICCs ranging from 0.61 to 0.98 and RMS CVs ranging from 4% to 14%.

Conclusion: MR imaging measurements of cartilage morphology, T2, and patellar T1-ρ demonstrated moderate to excellent reproducibility in a clinical trial network.

Citing Articles

Comparison of MRI and arthroscopy findings for transitional zone cartilage damage in the acetabulum of the hip joint.

Markhardt B, Hund S, Rosas H, Symanski J, Mao L, Spiker A Skeletal Radiol. 2024; 53(7):1303-1312.

PMID: 38225402 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-024-04563-0.


Correlations between elastic modulus and ultrashort echo time (UTE) adiabatic T1ρ relaxation time (UTE-Adiab-T1ρ) in Achilles tendons and entheses.

Jerban S, Afsahi A, Ma Y, Moazamian D, Statum S, Lombardi A J Biomech. 2023; 160:111825.

PMID: 37856976 PMC: 10991081. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111825.


A reproducibility study of knee cartilage volume and thickness values derived by fully automatic segmentation based on three-dimensional dual-echo in steady state data from 1.5 T and 3 T magnetic resonance imaging.

Zhang R, Zhou X, Raithel E, Ren C, Zhang P, Li J MAGMA. 2023; 37(1):69-82.

PMID: 37815638 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-023-01122-x.


Which risk factors determine cartilage thickness and composition change in radiographically normal knees? - Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Eckstein F, Maschek S, Culvenor A, Sharma L, Roemer F, Duda G Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2023; 5(3):100365.

PMID: 37207279 PMC: 10188628. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2023.100365.


Making the invisible visible-ultrashort echo time magnetic resonance imaging: Technical developments and applications.

Ma Y, Jang H, Jerban S, Chang E, Chung C, Bydder G Appl Phys Rev. 2022; 9(4):041303.

PMID: 36467869 PMC: 9677812. DOI: 10.1063/5.0086459.


References
1.
Mosher T, Liu Y, Torok C . Functional cartilage MRI T2 mapping: evaluating the effect of age and training on knee cartilage response to running. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009; 18(3):358-64. PMC: 2826588. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2009.11.011. View

2.
. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001; 69(3):89-95. DOI: 10.1067/mcp.2001.113989. View

3.
Mosher T, Dardzinski B . Cartilage MRI T2 relaxation time mapping: overview and applications. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2005; 8(4):355-68. DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-861764. View

4.
Dardzinski B, Mosher T, Li S, Van Slyke M, Smith M . Spatial variation of T2 in human articular cartilage. Radiology. 1997; 205(2):546-50. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.205.2.9356643. View

5.
Eckstein F, Hudelmaier M, Wirth W, Kiefer B, Jackson R, Yu J . Double echo steady state magnetic resonance imaging of knee articular cartilage at 3 Tesla: a pilot study for the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005; 65(4):433-41. PMC: 1798091. DOI: 10.1136/ard.2005.039370. View