» Articles » PMID: 21190037

The Effect of Different First 200-m Pacing Strategies on Blood Lactate and Biomechanical Parameters of the 400-m Sprint

Overview
Specialty Physiology
Date 2010 Dec 31
PMID 21190037
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of three pacing strategies upon performance of the 400-m sprint. Eight healthy male physical education students participated in this study. Each participant performed a 200-m maximal test (200(MAX)) and three 400-m running tests in a random counterbalanced design. The 400-m tests were run with the first 200-m pace set at 98% (400(98%)), 95% (400(95%)), and 93% (400(93%)), respectively, of the effort for 200(MAX). The stimulation of the lactate system was assessed by post-test blood lactate concentration (BLa). Running speed (RS) was controlled with time-keeping devices. Stride frequency (SF), stride length (SL) and lower extremity kinematics were acquired with video cameras operating at 100 fps at the 125 and 380-m marks of the tests. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures was used to identify modifications caused by the pacing strategies used. Non-significant differences were revealed for BLa. The fastest 400-m race was run in 400(93%), but performance was not significantly different (p > 0.05) among the examined pacing strategies. RS, SF and SL had significantly (p < 0.05) lower values in the 380-m mark when compared with the 125-m mark. In 400(98%), both SF and SL decreased by approximately 13%, while SF and SL dropped 2.4 and 9.2%, respectively, in 400(93%). In conclusion, lower peak BLa and less unfavorable modifications of running mechanics were recorded in 400(93%), where time differential between the halves of the 400-m race was smaller, which eventually resulted in better performance.

Citing Articles

Effectiveness Index of Mechanical Energy Utilization in Male 400-m Sprinters and the Relation Between Muscle Cross-Sectional Area of the Trunk and the Lower Limb.

Muratomi K, Tarumi T, Furuhashi Y, Ushirooka N, Hoshi D, Fukuie M Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2025; 35(2):e70023.

PMID: 39923119 PMC: 11807237. DOI: 10.1111/sms.70023.


Kinematics of Two Special Endurance Trials: A Methodological Contribution to 400-m Performance.

Mackala K, Omelko R, Mroczek D, Szczepan S, Mastalerz A J Hum Kinet. 2024; 93:181-191.

PMID: 39132425 PMC: 11307176. DOI: 10.5114/jhk/185155.


Usefulness of V˙O2 Kinetics and Biomechanical Parameters as Predictors of Athlete's Performance in 800 m Running Race.

Navarro V, Diaz-Pintado J, Piero D, Huertas Olmedo F Sports (Basel). 2023; 11(1).

PMID: 36668719 PMC: 9862118. DOI: 10.3390/sports11010015.


The Problem of Effort Distribution in Heavy Glycolytic Trials with Special Reference to the 400 m Dash in Track and Field.

Cicchella A Biology (Basel). 2022; 11(2).

PMID: 35205083 PMC: 8869504. DOI: 10.3390/biology11020216.


Sprinting with prosthetic versus biological legs: insight from experimental data.

Beck O, Taboga P, Grabowski A R Soc Open Sci. 2022; 9(1):211799.

PMID: 35070345 PMC: 8728174. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.211799.


References
1.
Mero A, Komi P . Force-, EMG-, and elasticity-velocity relationships at submaximal, maximal and supramaximal running speeds in sprinters. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1986; 55(5):553-61. DOI: 10.1007/BF00421652. View

2.
Hanon C, Gajer B . Velocity and stride parameters of world-class 400-meter athletes compared with less experienced runners. J Strength Cond Res. 2009; 23(2):524-31. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318194e071. View

3.
Simonsen E, Thomsen L, Klausen K . Activity of mono- and biarticular leg muscles during sprint running. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1985; 54(5):524-32. DOI: 10.1007/BF00422964. View

4.
Nummela A, Rusko H . Acclimatization to altitude and normoxic training improve 400-m running performance at sea level. J Sports Sci. 2000; 18(6):411-9. DOI: 10.1080/02640410050074340. View

5.
Ohkuwa T, Kato Y, Katsumata K, Nakao T, Miyamura M . Blood lactate and glycerol after 400-m and 3,000-m runs in sprint and long distance runners. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1984; 53(3):213-8. DOI: 10.1007/BF00776592. View