» Articles » PMID: 14767249

Interaction of Step Length and Step Rate During Sprint Running

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2004 Feb 10
PMID 14767249
Citations 67
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled: A "negative interaction" between step length and step rate refers to an increase in one factor resulting in a decrease in the other.

Purposes: There were three main purposes: a) to investigate the relative influence of the determinants of step length and step rate, b) to determine the sources of negative interaction between step length and step rate, and c) to investigate the effects of manipulation of this interaction.

Methods: Thirty-six athletes performed maximal-effort sprints. Video and ground reaction force data were collected at the 16-m mark. Sprint velocity, step length, step rate, and their underlying determinants were calculated. Analyses included correlations, multiple linear regressions, paired t-tests, and a simple simulation based on alterations in flight determining parameters.

Results: A wide range of step length and step rate combinations was evident, even for subgroups of athletes with similar sprint velocities. This was partly due to a negative interaction that existed between step length and step rate; that is, those athletes who used a longer step length tended to have a lower step rate and vice versa. Vertical velocity of takeoff was the most prominent source of the negative interaction.

Conclusions: Leg length, height of takeoff, and vertical velocity of takeoff are all possible sources of a negative interaction between step length and step rate. The very high step lengths and step rates achieved by elite sprinters may be possible only by a technique that involves a high horizontal and low vertical velocity of takeoff. However, a greater vertical velocity of takeoff might be of advantage when an athlete is fatigued and struggling to maintain a high step rate.

Citing Articles

Running Parameter Analysis in 400 m Sprint Using Real-Time Kinematic Global Navigation Satellite Systems.

Onodera K, Miyamoto N, Hirose K, Kondo A, Kajiwara W, Nakano H Sensors (Basel). 2025; 25(4).

PMID: 40006301 PMC: 11859285. DOI: 10.3390/s25041073.


Effects of different warm-up methods on 50-meter breaststroke swimming performance.

Lee H, Chao T, Hsu C, Chang N, Chen Y, Tsai Y Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025; 12():1505648.

PMID: 39840133 PMC: 11746113. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1505648.


Evaluation of WIMU Sensor Performance in Estimating Running Stride and Vertical Stiffness in Football Training Sessions: A Comparison with Smart Insoles.

Pinelli S, Mandorino M, Lacome M, Fantozzi S Sensors (Basel). 2025; 24(24.

PMID: 39771821 PMC: 11679392. DOI: 10.3390/s24248087.


The Measurement of Spatiotemporal Parameters in Running at Different Velocities: A Comparison Between a GPS Unit and an Infrared Mat.

Provot T, Millot B, Hazotte E, Rousseau T, Slawinski J Methods Protoc. 2024; 7(6).

PMID: 39728623 PMC: 11676369. DOI: 10.3390/mps7060103.


The influence of lightweight wearable resistance on whole body coordination during sprint acceleration among Australian Rules football players.

Trounson K, Robertson S, Ball K PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0313290.

PMID: 39499738 PMC: 11537414. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313290.