Geometry of the Vertebral Bodies and the Intervertebral Discs in Lumbar Segments Adjacent to Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis: Pilot Study

Overview

Journal Eur Spine J

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2010 Dec 25

PMID 21181481

Citations 20

Authors

Ella Been

Ling Li

David J Hunter

Leonid Kalichman

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The objective is to evaluate the geometric parameters of vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs in spinal segments adjacent to spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. This pilot cross-sectional study was an ancillary project to the Framingham Heart Study. The presence of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis as well as measurements of spinal geometry were identified on CT imaging of 188 individuals. Spinal geometry measurements included lordosis angle, wedging of each lumbar vertebra and intervertebral disc. Last measurements were used to calculate ΣB, the sum of the lumbar L1-L5 body wedge angles; and ΣD, the sum of the lumbar L1-L5 intervertebral disc angles. Using Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test we compared the geometric parameters between individuals with no pathology and ones with spondylolysis (with no listhesis) at L5 vertebra, ones with isthmic spondylolisthesis at L5-S1 level, and ones with degenerative spondylolisthesis at L5-S1 level. Spinal geometry in individuals with spondylolysis or listhesis at L5 shows three major patterns: In spondylolysis without listhesis, spinal morphology is similar to that of healthy individuals; In isthmic spondylolisthesis there is high lordosis angle, high L5 vertebral body wedging and very high L4-5 disc wedging; In degenerative spondylolisthesis, spinal morphology shows more lordotic wedging of the L5 vertebral body, and less lordotic wedging of intervertebral discs. In conclusion, there are unique geometrical features of the vertebrae and discs in spondylolysis or listhesis. These findings need to be reproduced in larger scale study.

Citing Articles

Automatic measurement of anatomical parameters of the lumbar vertebral body and the intervertebral disc on radiographs by deep learning.

Yao H, Zhang Z, Cheng G, Chen X, He L, Wang W Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(8):5877-5890.

PMID: 39143991 PMC: 11320507. DOI: 10.21037/qims-23-1859.

L4/5 Disc Herniation: Not Unusually Accompanied with L5/S1 Low-Grade Spondylolytic Spondylolisthesis.

Zhou H, Zhou Q, Wang B, Qiu Y, Zhu Z, Liu Z Orthop Surg. 2024; 16(2):444-451.

PMID: 38214088 PMC: 10834192. DOI: 10.1111/os.13984.

Optimal cutoff point of vertebral body cross-sectional area as a morphological parameter for predicting lumbar spondylolysis.

Park S, Song Y, Oh S, Kim Y Medicine (Baltimore). 2023; 102(37):e35173.

PMID: 37713872 PMC: 10508529. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035173.

Predictors of Postoperative Segmental and Overall Lumbar Lordosis in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Consecutive Case Series.

Zhang J, Greenberg J, Javeed S, Benedict B, Botterbush K, Dibble C Global Spine J. 2023; 15(2):425-437.

PMID: 37522797 PMC: 11877597. DOI: 10.1177/21925682231193610.

Biomechanical responses of human lumbar spine and pelvis according to the Roussouly classification.

Wang W, Pei B, Wu S, Lu D, He P, Ma C PLoS One. 2022; 17(7):e0266954.

PMID: 35905050 PMC: 9337691. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266954.

References

Labelle H, Roussouly P, Chopin D, Berthonnaud E, Hresko T, OBrien M . Spino-pelvic alignment after surgical correction for developmental spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J. 2008; 17(9):1170-6. PMC: 2527424. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-008-0713-y. View

Krupski W, Majcher P, Tatara M . Computed tomorgaphy diagnostic of lumbar spondylolysis. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2007; 6(5):652-7. View

Colombini A, Lombardi G, Marco Corsi M, Banfi G . Pathophysiology of the human intervertebral disc. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2008; 40(5):837-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocel.2007.12.011. View

Chen Y . Geometric measurements of the lumbar spine in Chinese men during trunk flexion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999; 24(7):666-9. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199904010-00010. View

TEPLICK J, Laffey P, Berman A, HASKIN M . Diagnosis and evaluation of spondylolisthesis and/or spondylolysis on axial CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1986; 7(3):479-91. PMC: 8331354. View

Rosenberg N . Degenerative spondylolisthesis. Predisposing factors. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975; 57(4):467-74. View

Been E, Barash A, Pessah H, Peleg S . A new look at the geometry of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010; 35(20):E1014-7. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ddd433. View

De Carvalho D, Soave D, Ross K, Callaghan J . Lumbar spine and pelvic posture between standing and sitting: a radiologic investigation including reliability and repeatability of the lumbar lordosis measure. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2010; 33(1):48-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2009.11.008. View

Saraste H, Brostrom L, Aparisi T . Prognostic radiographic aspects of spondylolisthesis. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1984; 25(5):427-32. DOI: 10.1177/028418518402500515. View

10.

Chen I, Wei T . Disc height and lumbar index as independent predictors of degenerative spondylolisthesis in middle-aged women with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34(13):1402-9. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817b8fbd. View

11.

Boulay C, Tardieu C, Hecquet J, Benaim C, Mouilleseaux B, Marty C . Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence: standard values and prediction of lordosis. Eur Spine J. 2005; 15(4):415-22. PMC: 3489325. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-005-0984-5. View

12.

Huang K, Lin R, Lee Y, Li J . Factors affecting disability and physical function in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis of L4-5: evaluation with axially loaded MRI. Eur Spine J. 2009; 18(12):1851-7. PMC: 2899437. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-1059-9. View

13.

Lee Splansky G, Corey D, Yang Q, Atwood L, Cupples L, Benjamin E . The Third Generation Cohort of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Framingham Heart Study: design, recruitment, and initial examination. Am J Epidemiol. 2007; 165(11):1328-35. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwm021. View

14.

Saraste H, Brostrom L, Aparisi T . Radiographic assessment of anatomic deviations in lumbar spondylolysis. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1984; 25(4):317-23. DOI: 10.1177/028418518402500412. View

15.

Mauch F, Jung C, Huth J, Bauer G . Changes in the lumbar spine of athletes from supine to the true-standing position in magnetic resonance imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010; 35(9):1002-7. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bdb2d3. View

16.

Kalichman L, Kim D, Li L, Guermazi A, Berkin V, Hunter D . Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: prevalence and association with low back pain in the adult community-based population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34(2):199-205. PMC: 3793342. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818edcfd. View

17.

Urban J, Winlove C . Pathophysiology of the intervertebral disc and the challenges for MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007; 25(2):419-32. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20874. View

18.

Feinleib M, Kannel W, Garrison R, MCNAMARA P, CASTELLI W . The Framingham Offspring Study. Design and preliminary data. Prev Med. 1975; 4(4):518-25. DOI: 10.1016/0091-7435(75)90037-7. View

19.

Mac-Thiong J, Wang Z, De Guise J, Labelle H . Postural model of sagittal spino-pelvic alignment and its relevance for lumbosacral developmental spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33(21):2316-25. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318186b236. View

20.

Natarajan R, Andersson G . The influence of lumbar disc height and cross-sectional area on the mechanical response of the disc to physiologic loading. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999; 24(18):1873-81. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199909150-00003. View