» Articles » PMID: 26916466

Morphological and Postural Sexual Dimorphism of the Lumbar Spine Facilitates Greater Lordosis in Females

Overview
Journal J Anat
Date 2016 Feb 27
PMID 26916466
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous work suggests females are evolutionarily adapted to have greater lumbar lordosis than males to aid in pregnancy load-bearing, but no consensus exists. To explore further sex-differences in the lumbar spine, and to understand contradictions in the literature, we conducted a cross-sectional retrospective study of sex-differences in lumbar spine morphology and sacral orientation. In addition, our sample includes data for separate standing and supine samples of males and females to examine potential sex-differences in postural loading on lumbosacral morphology. We measured sagittal lumbosacral morphology on 200 radiographs. Measurements include: lumbar angle (L1-S1), lumbar vertebral body and disc wedging angles, sacral slope and pelvic incidence. Lumbar angle, representative of lordotic curvature between L1 and S1, was 7.3° greater in females than males, when standing. There were no significant sex-differences in lumbar angle when supine. This difference in standing lumbar angle can be explained by greater lordotic wedging of the lumbar vertebrae (L1-L5) in females. Additionally, sacral slope was greater in females than males, when standing. There were no significant sex-differences in pelvic incidence. Our results support that females have greater lumbar lordosis than males when standing, but not when supine - suggesting a potentially greater range of motion in the female spine. Furthermore, sex-differences in the lumbar spine appear to be supported by postural differences in sacral-orientation and morphological differences in the vertebral body wedging. A better understanding of sex-differences in lumbosacral morphology may explain sex-differences in spinal conditions, as well as promote necessary sex-specific treatments.

Citing Articles

Validity and Reliability of Kinovea for Pelvic Kinematic Measurement in Standing Position and in Sitting Position with 45° of Hip Flexion.

Vicente-Pina L, Sanchez-Rodriguez R, Ferrandez-Laliena L, Heredia-Jimenez J, Muller-Thyssen-Uriarte J, Monti-Ballano S Sensors (Basel). 2025; 25(1.

PMID: 39797041 PMC: 11723398. DOI: 10.3390/s25010250.


Trends of Korean medicine service utilization for lumbar disc herniation and spinal stenosis: A 10-year analysis of the 2010 to 2019 data.

Yang M, Kim E, Nam D, Park Y, Ha I, Kim D Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(30):e38989.

PMID: 39058889 PMC: 11272331. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038989.


MRI study on the influence of lumbosacral vertebral body and disc factors on lumbar lordosis in children.

Ren H, Lin N, Zhao P, Han H, Zhao H, Xiao L Eur Spine J. 2024; 33(12):4449-4456.

PMID: 38976000 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08388-2.


Functional analysis of postural spinal and pelvic parameters using static and dynamic spinometry.

Bode T, Zoroofchi S, Vettorazzi E, Droste J, Welsch G, Schwesig R Heliyon. 2024; 10(7):e29239.

PMID: 38633646 PMC: 11021985. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29239.


Immediate Effect of Simulated High Heels on Pelvic and Spinal Posture in Healthy Young Subjects: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Colonna S, Borghi C, Galvani M, DAlessandro A Cureus. 2024; 16(3):e55586.

PMID: 38576640 PMC: 10994651. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.55586.


References
1.
Murrie V, Dixon A, Hollingworth W, Wilson H, Doyle T . Lumbar lordosis: study of patients with and without low back pain. Clin Anat. 2003; 16(2):144-7. DOI: 10.1002/ca.10114. View

2.
Le Huec J, Aunoble S, Philippe L, Nicolas P . Pelvic parameters: origin and significance. Eur Spine J. 2011; 20 Suppl 5:564-71. PMC: 3175921. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1940-1. View

3.
Jackson R, Peterson M, McManus A, Hales C . Compensatory spinopelvic balance over the hip axis and better reliability in measuring lordosis to the pelvic radius on standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers and patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998; 23(16):1750-67. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199808150-00008. View

4.
Burton A, Tillotson K . Reference values for 'normal' regional lumbar sagittal mobility. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2013; 3(2):106-13. DOI: 10.1016/0268-0033(88)90053-8. View

5.
Endo K, Suzuki H, Nishimura H, Tanaka H, Shishido T, Yamamoto K . Sagittal lumbar and pelvic alignment in the standing and sitting positions. J Orthop Sci. 2012; 17(6):682-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00776-012-0281-1. View