» Articles » PMID: 21119228

Tapered LSO Arrays for Small Animal PET

Overview
Journal Phys Med Biol
Publisher IOP Publishing
Date 2010 Dec 2
PMID 21119228
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

By using detectors with good depth encoding accuracy (∼2 mm), an animal PET scanner can be built with a small ring diameter and thick crystals to simultaneously obtain high spatial resolution and high sensitivity. However, there will be large wedge-shaped gaps between detector modules in such a scanner if traditional cuboid crystal arrays are used in a polygonal arrangement. The gaps can be minimized by using tapered scintillator arrays enabling the sensitivity of the scanner to be further improved. In this work, tapered lutetium oxyorthosilicate (LSO) arrays with different crystal dimensions and different combinations of inter-crystal reflector and crystal surface treatments were manufactured and their performance was evaluated. Arrays were read out from both ends by position-sensitive avalanche photodiodes (PSAPDs). In the optimal configuration, arrays consisting of 0.5 mm LSO elements could be clearly resolved and a depth of interaction resolution of 2.6 mm was obtained for a 20 mm thick array. For this tapered array, the intrinsic spatial is degraded from 0.67 to 0.75 mm compared to a standard cuboidal array with similar dimensions, while the increase in efficiency is 41%. Tapered scintillator arrays offer the prospect of improvements in sensitivity and sampling for small-bore scanners, without large increases in manufacturing complexity.

Citing Articles

Improvement of Crystal Identification Accuracy for Depth-of-Interaction Detector System with Peak-to-Charge Discrimination Method.

Miyata K, Ogawara R, Ishikawa M Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(10).

PMID: 37430498 PMC: 10223191. DOI: 10.3390/s23104584.


Technical opportunities and challenges in developing total-body PET scanners for mice and rats.

Du J, Jones T EJNMMI Phys. 2023; 10(1):2.

PMID: 36592266 PMC: 9807733. DOI: 10.1186/s40658-022-00523-6.


Design and evaluation of gapless curved scintillator arrays for simultaneous high-resolution and high-sensitivity brain PET.

Du J, Bai X, Liu C, Qi J, Cherry S Phys Med Biol. 2019; 64(23):235004.

PMID: 31618708 PMC: 7485540. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab4e3c.


Performance comparison of depth-encoding detectors based on dual-ended readout and different SiPMs for high-resolution PET applications.

Du J, Bai X, Cherry S Phys Med Biol. 2019; 64(15):15NT03.

PMID: 31018180 PMC: 7477918. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab1c37.


Feasibility Study of a Small Animal PET Insert Based on a Single LYSO Monolithic Tube.

Gonzalez A, Berr S, Canizares G, Gonzalez-Montoro A, Orero A, Correcher C Front Med (Lausanne). 2018; 5:328.

PMID: 30547030 PMC: 6279866. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00328.


References
1.
Judenhofer M, Pichler B, Cherry S . Evaluation of high performance data acquisition boards for simultaneous sampling of fast signals from PET detectors. Phys Med Biol. 2005; 50(1):29-44. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/1/003. View

2.
Yang Y, Dokhale P, Silverman R, Shah K, McClish M, Farrell R . Depth of interaction resolution measurements for a high resolution PET detector using position sensitive avalanche photodiodes. Phys Med Biol. 2006; 51(9):2131-42. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/9/001. View

3.
Schafers K, Reader A, Kriens M, Knoess C, Schober O, Schafers M . Performance evaluation of the 32-module quadHIDAC small-animal PET scanner. J Nucl Med. 2005; 46(6):996-1004. View

4.
Shao Y, Yao R, Ma T . A novel method to calibrate DOI function of a PET detector with a dual-ended-scintillator readout. Med Phys. 2009; 35(12):5829-40. DOI: 10.1118/1.3021118. View

5.
Wang Y, Seidel J, Tsui B, Vaquero J, Pomper M . Performance evaluation of the GE healthcare eXplore VISTA dual-ring small-animal PET scanner. J Nucl Med. 2006; 47(11):1891-900. View