» Articles » PMID: 21111007

The Four Trypanosomatid EIF4E Homologues Fall into Two Separate Groups, with Distinct Features in Primary Sequence and Biological Properties

Abstract

Translation initiation in eukaryotes requires eIF4E, the cap binding protein, which mediates its function through an interaction with the scaffolding protein eIF4G, as part of the eIF4F complex. In trypanosomatids, four eIF4E homologues have been described but the specific function of each is not well characterized. Here, we report a study of these proteins in Trypanosoma brucei (TbEIF4E1 through 4). At the sequence level, they can be assigned to two groups: TbEIF4E1 and 2, similar in size to metazoan eIF4E1; and TbEIF4E3 and 4, with long N-terminal extensions. All are constitutively expressed, but whilst TbEIF4E1 and 2 localize to both the nucleus and cytoplasm, TbEIF4E3 and 4 are strictly cytoplasmic and are also more abundant. After knockdown through RNAi, TbEIF4E3 was the only homologue confirmed to be essential for viability of the insect procyclic form. In contrast, TbEIF4E1, 3 and 4 were all essential for the mammalian bloodstream form. Simultaneous RNAi knockdown of TbEIF4E1 and 2 caused cessation of growth and death in procyclics, but with a delayed impact on translation, whilst knockdown of TbEIF4E3 alone or a combined TbEIF4E1 and 4 knockdown led to substantial translation inhibition which preceded cellular death by several days, at least. Only TbEIF4E3 and 4 were found to interact with T. brucei eIF4G homologues; TbEIF4E3 bound both TbEIF4G3 and 4 whilst TbEIF4E4 bound only to TbEIF4G3. These results are consistent with TbEIF4E3 and 4 having distinct but relevant roles in initiation of protein synthesis.

Citing Articles

Trypanosoma cruzi eIF4E3- and eIF4E4-containing complexes bind different mRNAs and may sequester inactive mRNAs during nutritional stress.

Gabiatti B, Freire E, Ferreira da Costa J, Galvao Ferrarini M, Reichert Assuncao de Matos T, Preti H Nucleic Acids Res. 2024; 53(2.

PMID: 39658061 PMC: 11754739. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkae1181.


Structural analysis of the Trypanosoma brucei EIF4E6/EIF4G5 complex reveals details of the interaction between unusual eIF4F subunits.

Penteado R, da Silva R, Moura D, de Lima G, Malvezzi A, Monteiro T Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):2178.

PMID: 38272944 PMC: 10810786. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-52364-1.


Distinct mRNA and protein interactomes highlight functional differentiation of major eIF4F-like complexes from .

Bezerra M, Moura D, Freire E, Holetz F, Reis C, Monteiro T Front Mol Biosci. 2022; 9:971811.

PMID: 36275617 PMC: 9585242. DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.971811.


Analysis of domain organization and functional signatures of trypanosomatid keIF4Gs.

DAS S Mol Cell Biochem. 2022; 477(10):2415-2431.

PMID: 35585276 DOI: 10.1007/s11010-022-04464-7.


Characterization of an Atypical eIF4E Ortholog in , LeishIF4E-6.

Tupperwar N, Shrivastava R, Baron N, Korchev O, Dahan I, Shapira M Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(23).

PMID: 34884522 PMC: 8657474. DOI: 10.3390/ijms222312720.


References
1.
Scheper G, Proud C . Does phosphorylation of the cap-binding protein eIF4E play a role in translation initiation?. Eur J Biochem. 2002; 269(22):5350-9. PMC: 7163980. DOI: 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2002.03291.x. View

2.
Hernandez G, Vazquez-Pianzola P . Functional diversity of the eukaryotic translation initiation factors belonging to eIF4 families. Mech Dev. 2005; 122(7-8):865-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.mod.2005.04.002. View

3.
Yoffe Y, Leger M, Zinoviev A, Zuberek J, Darzynkiewicz E, Wagner G . Evolutionary changes in the Leishmania eIF4F complex involve variations in the eIF4E-eIF4G interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009; 37(10):3243-53. PMC: 2691829. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkp190. View

4.
Haile S, Papadopoulou B . Developmental regulation of gene expression in trypanosomatid parasitic protozoa. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2008; 10(6):569-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.mib.2007.10.001. View

5.
Gingras A, Raught B, Sonenberg N . eIF4 initiation factors: effectors of mRNA recruitment to ribosomes and regulators of translation. Annu Rev Biochem. 2000; 68:913-63. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.68.1.913. View