320-row CT Coronary Angiography: Effect of 100-kV Tube Voltages on Image Quality, Contrast Volume, and Radiation Dose
Overview
Affiliations
To prospectively evaluate image quality parameters, contrast volume and radiation dose at the 100-kilovolt (kV) setting during coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) on a 320-row computed tomography scanner. We enrolled 107 consecutive patients with a heart rate <65 beats per minute (bpm) undergoing prospective electrocardiogram (ECG)-triggered CCTA. Forty patients with a body mass index (BMI) <25 kg/m(2) were scanned using 100-kV tube voltage settings, while 67 patients were scanned using 120-kV protocols. Image quality was assessed by two readers unaware of patient information and scan parameters. Attenuation in the aorta and perivascular fat tissue and image noise were measured. Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) and contrast material volumes were calculated. The effective radiation doses were estimated using a chest conversion coefficient (0.017). Diagnostic image quality was achieved in 98.2% of coronary segments with 100-kV CCTA and 98.6% of coronary segments with 120-kV CCTA, with no significant differences in image quality scores for each coronary segment. Vessel attenuation, image noise, and CNR were not significantly different between the 100- and 120-kV protocols. Mean contrast injection rate and mean material volume were significantly lower for the 100-kV CCTA (4.35 ± 0.28 ml/s and 53.13 ± 3.77 ml, respectively) than for the 120-kV CCTA (5.16 ± 0.21 ml/s and 62.40 ± 3.66 ml respectively; P < 0.001). The effective radiation dose was 2.12 ± 0.19 mSv for 100-kV CCTA, a reduction of 54% compared to 4.61 ± 0.82 mSv for 120-kV CCTA. A 100-kV CCTA can be implemented in patients with a BMI < 25 kg/m(2). The 100-kV setting allows significant reductions in contrast material volume and effective radiation dose while maintaining adequate diagnostic image quality.
Caruso D, De Santis D, Tremamunno G, Santangeli C, Polidori T, Bona G Eur Radiol. 2024; .
PMID: 39299952 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-11059-x.
Huang X, Gao S, Ma Y, Lu X, Jia Z, Hou Y Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2020; 10(3):592-603.
PMID: 32269920 PMC: 7136738. DOI: 10.21037/qims.2020.02.17.
Mousavi-Gazafroudi S, Sajjadieh-Khajouei A, Moradi M, Mousavi-Gazafroudi S, Yadegarfar G, Tavakoli M ARYA Atheroscler. 2020; 15(5):205-210.
PMID: 31949446 PMC: 6954360. DOI: 10.22122/arya.v15i5.1406.
Tan S, Ng K, Yeong C, Aman R, Sani F, Abdul Aziz Y Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2019; 9(4):552-564.
PMID: 31143647 PMC: 6511728. DOI: 10.21037/qims.2019.03.13.
Lee J, Kim T, Lee B, Yoon Y, Kwon H, Hong B Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):1308.
PMID: 30718631 PMC: 6362232. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-37870-3.