» Articles » PMID: 21063470

Transdermal Fluid Loss in Severely Burned Patients

Overview
Journal Ger Med Sci
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2010 Nov 11
PMID 21063470
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The skin protects against fluid and electrolyte loss. Burn injury does affect skin integrity and protection against fluid loss is lost. Thus, a systemic dehydration can be provoked by underestimation of fluid loss through burn wounds.

Purpose: We wanted to quantify transdermal fluid loss in burn wounds.

Method: Retrospective study. 40 patients admitted to a specialized burn unit were analyzed and separated in two groups without (Group A) or with (Group B) hypernatremia. Means of daily infusion-diuresis-ratio (IDR) and the relationship to totally burned surface area (TBSA) were analyzed.

Results: In Group A 25 patients with a mean age of 47 ± 18 years, a mean TBSA of 23 ± 11%, and a mean abbreviated burned severity index (ABSI) score of 6.9 ± 2.1 were summarized. In Group B 15 patients with a mean age of 47 ± 22 years, a mean TBSA of 30 ± 13%, and a mean ABSI score of 8.1 ± 1.7 were included. Statistical analysis of the period from day 3 to day 6 showed a significant higher daily IDR-amount in Group A (Group A vs. Group B: 786 ± 1029 ml vs. -181 ± 1021 ml; p<0.001) and for daily IDR-TBSA-ratio (Group A vs. Group B: 40 ± 41 ml/% vs. -4 ± 36 ml/%; p<0.001).

Conclusions: There is a systemic relevant transdermal fluid loss in burn wounds after severe burn injury. Serum sodium concentration can be used to calculate need of fluid resuscitation for fluid maintenance. There is a need of an established fluid removal strategy to avoid water and electrolyte imbalances.

Citing Articles

Novel multi-spectral short-wave infrared imaging for assessment of human burn wound depth.

Nunez J, Mironov S, Wan B, Hazime A, Clark A, Akarichi C Wound Repair Regen. 2024; 32(6):979-991.

PMID: 39323286 PMC: 11584362. DOI: 10.1111/wrr.13221.


Mathematical model of volume kinetics and renal function after burn injury and resuscitation.

Arabidarrehdor G, Tivay A, Bighamian R, Meador C, Kramer G, Hahn J Burns. 2020; 47(2):371-386.

PMID: 33189456 PMC: 9901540. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.07.003.


From Grafts to Human Bioengineered Vascularized Skin Substitutes.

Oualla-Bachiri W, Fernandez-Gonzalez A, Quinones-Vico M, Arias-Santiago S Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(21).

PMID: 33147759 PMC: 7662999. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21218197.


Methodologies in creating skin substitutes.

Nicholas M, Jeschke M, Amini-Nik S Cell Mol Life Sci. 2016; 73(18):3453-72.

PMID: 27154041 PMC: 4982839. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-016-2252-8.


Progressive fluid removal can avoid electrolyte disorders in severely burned patients.

Namdar T, Leonard Stollwerck P, Stang F, Kolios G, Lange T, Mailander P Ger Med Sci. 2011; 9:Doc13.

PMID: 21698085 PMC: 3118691. DOI: 10.3205/000136.

References
1.
Heimbach D, Engrav L, Grube B, Marvin J . Burn depth: a review. World J Surg. 1992; 16(1):10-5. DOI: 10.1007/BF02067108. View

2.
Polderman K, Schreuder W, Strack van Schijndel R, Thijs L . Hypernatremia in the intensive care unit: an indicator of quality of care?. Crit Care Med. 1999; 27(6):1105-8. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199906000-00029. View

3.
BAXTER C, SHIRES T . Physiological response to crystalloid resuscitation of severe burns. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1968; 150(3):874-94. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1968.tb14738.x. View

4.
Janz T . Sodium. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1986; 4(1):115-30. View

5.
Rackow E, FALK J, FEIN I, Siegel J, Packman M, Haupt M . Fluid resuscitation in circulatory shock: a comparison of the cardiorespiratory effects of albumin, hetastarch, and saline solutions in patients with hypovolemic and septic shock. Crit Care Med. 1983; 11(11):839-50. View