» Articles » PMID: 6194934

Fluid Resuscitation in Circulatory Shock: a Comparison of the Cardiorespiratory Effects of Albumin, Hetastarch, and Saline Solutions in Patients with Hypovolemic and Septic Shock

Overview
Journal Crit Care Med
Date 1983 Nov 1
PMID 6194934
Citations 65
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Twenty-six consecutive patients in hypovolemic shock were randomized to fluid challenge with 5% albumin (A), 6% hetastarch (H), or 0.9% saline (S) solutions. Fluid challenge consisted of 250 ml of test fluid every 15 min until the pulmonary artery wedge pressure (WP) reached 15 mm Hg. Thereafter, WP was maintained at 15 mm Hg for an additional 24 h with infusions of the same test fluid. Vital signs, hemodynamic and respiratory variables, as well as arterial lactate and colloid osmotic pressure (COP) were monitored according to protocol. Chest x-rays were performed by standardized technique before fluid challenge and at 12 and 24 h of maintenance fluid therapy and were evaluated for evidence of pulmonary edema. Cardiac function and hemodynamic stability were restored by fluid challenge with A, H, and S. Two to 4 times the volume of S as A or H was required to achieve similar hemodynamic endpoints. COP was increased by fluid challenge with A or H but was markedly reduced by fluid challenge with S and throughout the 24-h maintenance period. Fluid challenge resulted in reductions in COP-WP gradient of 62% in the A, 43% in the H, and 125% in the S groups. Resuscitation with S resulted in a significantly higher incidence of pulmonary edema (87.5%) than did resuscitation with A (22%) or H (22%). Urine output was not different among the groups at any time during the study. We conclude that 6% H performs as well as 5% A as a resuscitative fluid and that resuscitation with either of these colloids is associated with a lower incidence of pulmonary edema than is resuscitation with 0.9% S.

Citing Articles

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2024.

Shime N, Nakada T, Yatabe T, Yamakawa K, Aoki Y, Inoue S Acute Med Surg. 2025; 12(1):e70037.

PMID: 39996161 PMC: 11848044. DOI: 10.1002/ams2.70037.


Human albumin for adults with sepsis: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Bai Z, Lai Y, Han K, Shi L, Guan X, Xu Y Medicine (Baltimore). 2025; 103(52):e40983.

PMID: 39969316 PMC: 11687998. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040983.


Comparing the compensatory reserve metric obtained from invasive arterial measurements and photoplethysmographic volume-clamp during simulated hemorrhage.

Webb K, Pruter W, Poole R, Techentin R, Johnson C, Regimbal R J Clin Monit Comput. 2024; 38(6):1337-1346.

PMID: 38733507 DOI: 10.1007/s10877-024-01166-x.


Intravenous fluid therapy in accordance with kidney injury risk: when to prescribe what volume of which solution.

Kanbay M, Copur S, Mizrak B, Ortiz A, Soler M Clin Kidney J. 2023; 16(4):684-692.

PMID: 37007689 PMC: 10061428. DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfac270.


Effect of goal-directed fluid therapy based on plasma colloid osmotic pressure on the postoperative pulmonary complications of older patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.

Feng A, Lu P, Yang Y, Liu Y, Ma L, Lv J World J Surg Oncol. 2023; 21(1):67.

PMID: 36849953 PMC: 9970856. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-023-02955-5.