» Articles » PMID: 21063399

Prognostic Biomarkers in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus: a Systematic Review

Overview
Journal Br J Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2010 Nov 11
PMID 21063399
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: recent decades have seen combination chemoradiotherapy become the standard treatment for anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). However, the burden of this disease continues to rise, with only 10% of patients with metastatic disease surviving >2 years. Further insight into tumour characteristics and molecular biology may identify novel therapeutic targets. This systematic review examines current prognostic markers in SCC of the anus.

Methods: an extensive literature search was performed to identify studies reporting on biomarkers in anal cancer in the context of clinical outcome following treatment primarily with chemoradiotherapy.

Results: in all, 21 studies were included. A total of 29 biomarkers were studied belonging to 9 different functional classes. Of these biomarkers, 13 were found to have an association with outcome in at least one study. The tumour-suppressor genes p53 and p21 were the only markers shown to be of prognostic value in more than one study.

Conclusions: an array of biomarkers have been identified that correlate with survival following chemoradiotherapy in anal cancer. However, investigators are yet to identify a biomarker that has the ability to consistently predict outcome in this disease. Further studies are needed to elucidate whether these candidate biomarkers demonstrate their optimum value when they serve as targets for new therapeutic strategies.

Citing Articles

HPV status and immunohistochemical analysis of p16, p53 and PD‑L1 expression as prognostic biomarkers in patients with squamous cell anal cancer receiving definitive radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy.

Balci Topuz B, Sert F, Sezak M, Soylu M, Yalman D, Ozkok S Oncol Lett. 2024; 28(2):395.

PMID: 38966586 PMC: 11223008. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2024.14528.


Molecular biomarkers, network biomarkers, and dynamic network biomarkers for diagnosis and prediction of rare diseases.

Tang S, Yuan K, Chen L Fundam Res. 2024; 2(6):894-902.

PMID: 38933388 PMC: 11197705. DOI: 10.1016/j.fmre.2022.07.011.


Biomarkers in Anal Cancer: Current Status in Diagnosis, Disease Progression and Therapeutic Strategies.

Mathias-Machado M, Peixoto R, Moniz C, Jacome A Biomedicines. 2022; 10(8).

PMID: 36009576 PMC: 9405643. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10082029.


Prognostic factors for patients with anal cancer treated with conformal radiotherapy-a systematic review.

Theophanous S, Samuel R, Lilley J, Henry A, Sebag-Montefiore D, Gilbert A BMC Cancer. 2022; 22(1):607.

PMID: 35659632 PMC: 9164501. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09729-4.


A Prospective Cohort Study of Biomarkers in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anal Canal (SCCAC) and their Influence on Treatment Outcomes.

Moniz C, Riechelmann R, Oliveira S, Bariani G, Rivelli T, Ortega C J Cancer. 2021; 12(23):7018-7025.

PMID: 34729104 PMC: 8558650. DOI: 10.7150/jca.57678.


References
1.
Oohira G, Yamada S, Ochiai T, Matsubara H, Okazumi S, Ando K . Growth suppression of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma induced by heavy carbon-ion beams combined with p53 gene transfer. Int J Oncol. 2004; 25(3):563-9. View

2.
Holm R, Skovlund E, Skomedal H, Florenes V, Tanum G . Reduced expression of p21WAF1 is an indicator of malignant behaviour in anal carcinomas. Histopathology. 2001; 39(1):43-9. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2559.2001.01161.x. View

3.
Bonner J, Harari P, Giralt J, Cohen R, Jones C, Sur R . Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer: 5-year survival data from a phase 3 randomised trial, and relation between cetuximab-induced rash and survival. Lancet Oncol. 2009; 11(1):21-8. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70311-0. View

4.
Cummings B . Metastatic anal cancer: the search for cure. Onkologie. 2006; 29(1-2):5-6. DOI: 10.1159/000090747. View

5.
Tanum G, Holm R . Anal carcinoma: a clinical approach to p53 and RB gene proteins. Oncology. 1996; 53(5):369-73. DOI: 10.1159/000227590. View