» Articles » PMID: 21061075

Impact of Progression During Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Surgical Management of Breast Cancer

Overview
Journal Ann Surg Oncol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2010 Nov 10
PMID 21061075
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) is standard therapy for locally advanced breast cancer, it remains controversial for early-stage disease due to concerns that disease progression may make breast-conservation therapy (BCT), or even operability, impossible. The goal of this study was to determine the impact of disease progression during NCT on surgical management.

Methods: We reviewed clinicopathological data on patients who received NCT for stage I-III breast cancer from 1994 to 2007. Chemotherapy regimens were anthracycline-and/or taxane-based as determined by the treating medical oncologist.

Results: Of 1,928 patients who received NCT, 1,762 (91%) had a partial or complete response, 107 (6%) had stable disease (SD), and 59 (3%) progressed (PD) while receiving at least one regimen. Of the patients with progressive disease, 40 (68%) patients underwent mastectomy, 12 (20%) underwent BCT, and 7 (12%) did not undergo surgery. In patients who underwent mastectomy, only three (8%) were BCT candidates before progression. Overall, disease progression changed the operative plan in 11 (0.5%) patients: 3 developed distant metastasis, 2 developed clinical lymphadenopathy, 3 required mastectomy instead of BCT, 2 became inoperable, and 1 required flap closure.

Conclusions: Disease progression while receiving NCT is infrequent (3%), but early identification may allow for change to other, potentially beneficial, therapeutic interventions. Patients with breast cancer who receive NCT should be evaluated frequently for response to therapy. Overall, progression during NCT changes the surgical management in a small proportion of patients.

Citing Articles

A Comprehensive Analysis of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: Adverse Events, Clinical Response Rates, and Surgical and Pathological Outcomes-Bozyaka Experience.

Yilmaz C, Zengel B, Ureyen O, Adibelli Z, Tasli F, Yilmaz H Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(2).

PMID: 39857945 PMC: 11763700. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17020163.


The Impact of Neoadjuvant versus Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Survival Outcomes in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer.

Ghasemi F, Brackstone M Curr Oncol. 2024; 31(10):6007-6016.

PMID: 39451752 PMC: 11505903. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31100448.


In-Breast Tumor Progression During Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Impact on and Factors Influencing Distant Recurrence-Free Survival.

Eckert K, Hoskin T, Olson C, Goetz M, Boughey J Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 31(13):8856-8865.

PMID: 39266789 PMC: 11560490. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16178-9.


A prospective single arm cohort study: An analysis of the effectiveness of surgical treatment of locally advanced breast cancer.

Xu Y, Huang X, Chen C, Li Y, Zhou Y, Shen S Heliyon. 2024; 10(16):e36279.

PMID: 39247320 PMC: 11378890. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36279.


Fluorine-18 FDG PET/CT and New NIMS Grading System for Chemotherapy Response in Breast Cancer.

Vakati G, Ratnagiri R, Srivastava M Indian J Nucl Med. 2024; 39(2):106-114.

PMID: 38989317 PMC: 11232735. DOI: 10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_117_23.


References
1.
Hunt K, Yi M, Mittendorf E, Guerrero C, Babiera G, Bedrosian I . Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is accurate and reduces the need for axillary dissection in breast cancer patients. Ann Surg. 2009; 250(4):558-66. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b8fd5e. View

2.
Eisenhauer E, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz L, Sargent D, Ford R . New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2008; 45(2):228-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026. View

3.
Taylor M, Perez C, Halverson K, Kuske R, PHILPOTT G, Garcia D . Factors influencing cosmetic results after conservation therapy for breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995; 31(4):753-64. DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)00480-3. View

4.
Chagpar A, Middleton L, Sahin A, Dempsey P, Buzdar A, Mirza A . Accuracy of physical examination, ultrasonography, and mammography in predicting residual pathologic tumor size in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg. 2006; 243(2):257-64. PMC: 1448900. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000197714.14318.6f. View

5.
van der Hage J, van de Velde C, Julien J, Tubiana-Hulin M, Vandervelden C, Duchateau L . Preoperative chemotherapy in primary operable breast cancer: results from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer trial 10902. J Clin Oncol. 2001; 19(22):4224-37. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.22.4224. View