» Articles » PMID: 21048972

Does Masculinity Matter? The Contribution of Masculine Face Shape to Male Attractiveness in Humans

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2010 Nov 5
PMID 21048972
Citations 56
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In many animals, exaggerated sex-typical male traits are preferred by females, and may be a signal of both past and current disease resistance. The proposal that the same is true in humans--i.e., that masculine men are immunocompetent and attractive--underpins a large literature on facial masculinity preferences. Recently, theoretical models have suggested that current condition may be a better index of mate value than past immunocompetence. This is particularly likely in populations where pathogenic fluctuation is fast relative to host life history. As life history is slow in humans, there is reason to expect that, among humans, condition-dependent traits might contribute more to attractiveness than relatively stable traits such as masculinity. To date, however, there has been little rigorous assessment of whether, in the presence of variation in other cues, masculinity predicts attractiveness or not.

Methodology/principal Findings: The relationship between masculinity and attractiveness was assessed in two samples of male faces. Most previous research has assessed masculinity either with subjective ratings or with simple anatomical measures. Here, we used geometric morphometric techniques to assess facial masculinity, generating a morphological masculinity measure based on a discriminant function that correctly classified >96% faces as male or female. When assessed using this measure, there was no relationship between morphological masculinity and rated attractiveness. In contrast, skin colour--a fluctuating, condition-dependent cue--was a significant predictor of attractiveness.

Conclusions/significance: These findings suggest that facial morphological masculinity may contribute less to men's attractiveness than previously assumed. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that current condition is more relevant to male mate value than past disease resistance, and hence that temporally fluctuating traits (such as colour) contribute more to male attractiveness than stable cues of sexual dimorphism.

Citing Articles

Further evidence that averageness and femininity, rather than symmetry and masculinity, predict facial attractiveness judgments.

Lee P, Li J, Rafiee Y, Jones B, Shiramizu V Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):5498.

PMID: 39953080 PMC: 11828934. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-86974-0.


The role of facial cues in signalling cooperativeness is limited and nuanced.

Lohse J, Sanchez-Pages S, Turiegano E Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):22009.

PMID: 39317718 PMC: 11422508. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-71685-9.


Autoimmune Hashimoto's Disease and Feminization Level-Testing .

Gozdzik M, Zelazniewicz A, Nowak-Kornicka J, Pawlowska-Seredynska K, Umlawska W, Pawlowski B Evol Psychol. 2024; 22(3):14747049241259187.

PMID: 39238450 PMC: 11378202. DOI: 10.1177/14747049241259187.


Mate assessment based on physical characteristics: a review and reflection.

Watkins C Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2024; 100(1):113-130.

PMID: 39175167 PMC: 11718632. DOI: 10.1111/brv.13131.


Re-evaluating the Role of Partnership-Related Perceptions in Women's Preferences for Men with Masculine Face Shapes.

Dong J, Leger K, Lee A, Rafiee Y, Jones B, Shiramizu V Evol Psychol. 2024; 22(2):14747049241262712.

PMID: 38881307 PMC: 11184995. DOI: 10.1177/14747049241262712.


References
1.
Pound N, Penton-Voak I, Surridge A . Testosterone responses to competition in men are related to facial masculinity. Proc Biol Sci. 2008; 276(1654):153-9. PMC: 2614257. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0990. View

2.
Rhodes G, Yoshikawa S, Palermo R, Simmons L, Peters M, Lee K . Perceived health contributes to the attractiveness of facial symmetry, averageness, and sexual dimorphism. Perception. 2007; 36(8):1244-52. DOI: 10.1068/p5712. View

3.
Rennels J, Bronstad P, Langlois J . Are attractive men's faces masculine or feminine? The importance of type of facial stimuli. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008; 34(4):884-93. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.4.884. View

4.
Komori M, Kawamura S, Ishihara S . Effect of averageness and sexual dimorphism on the judgment of facial attractiveness. Vision Res. 2009; 49(8):862-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.03.005. View

5.
Jones D, Hill K . Criteria of facial attractiveness in five populations. Hum Nat. 2013; 4(3):271-96. DOI: 10.1007/BF02692202. View