» Articles » PMID: 21048082

Songs of Darwin's Finches Diverge when a New Species Enters the Community

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2010 Nov 5
PMID 21048082
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bird species sing different songs and as a result rarely breed with each other. Species are not static but can shift in acoustic and morphological space, yet maintain their distinctiveness. Investigating such a situation in a community of Darwin's finches sheds light on the origin and maintenance of premating barriers between species. Explanations for songs divergence generally invoke morphological changes to the sound-producing apparatus, environmental changes influencing transmitting properties of song, avoidance of acoustical interference with other species, and random processes including copying errors. We investigated changes in songs of Geospiza fortis (medium ground finch) and Geospiza scandens (cactus ground finch) from 1978 to 2010 on Daphne Major Island, Galápagos. The habitat did not change significantly; however, the finch community changed. The socially aggressive congener Geospiza magnirostris (large ground finch), singing in the same frequency band (2-4 kHz), colonized Daphne in 1983 and increased in numbers. Temporal features of the songs of G. fortis and G. scandens, especially trill rate and song duration, diverged from G. magnirostris songs as it became increasingly common. Changes in song were not a passive consequence of a change in beak morphology. Instead they arose as a bias during song imprinting and production. Sons of both G. fortis and G. scandens sang faster songs than their respective fathers and thereby differed more from G. magnirostris in their songs than did their fathers. Divergence from an aversive or confusing stimulus during learning illustrates a "peak shift" that may be a common feature of song evolution and speciation.

Citing Articles

Chemical species recognition in an adaptive radiation of Hawaiian spiders (Araneae: Tetragnathidae).

Adams S, Gurajapu A, Qiang A, Gerbaulet M, Schulz S, Tsutsui N Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2020):20232340.

PMID: 38593845 PMC: 11003775. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2023.2340.


Migratory singers dynamically overlap the signal space of a breeding warbler community.

Sblendorio J, Vonhof M, Gill S Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(2):e11013.

PMID: 38405408 PMC: 10893555. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.11013.


Auditory and sexual preferences for a father's song can co-emerge in female Bengalese finches.

Fujii T, Okanoya K PLoS One. 2022; 17(3):e0254302.

PMID: 35271565 PMC: 8912213. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254302.


Animal cognition in an urbanised world.

Lee V, Thornton A Front Ecol Evol. 2021; 9.

PMID: 34409044 PMC: 7611524. DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2021.633947.


Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Clustering Taxa through Vocalizations in a Neotropical Passerine (Rough-Legged Tyrannulet, ).

Parra-Hernandez R, Posada-Quintero J, Acevedo-Charry O, Posada-Quintero H Animals (Basel). 2020; 10(8).

PMID: 32806680 PMC: 7460062. DOI: 10.3390/ani10081406.


References
1.
Rieseberg L, Raymond O, Rosenthal D, Lai Z, Livingstone K, Nakazato T . Major ecological transitions in wild sunflowers facilitated by hybridization. Science. 2003; 301(5637):1211-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.1086949. View

2.
Ten Cate C, Verzijden M, Etman E . Sexual imprinting can induce sexual preferences for exaggerated parental traits. Curr Biol. 2006; 16(11):1128-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.03.068. View

3.
Goodale E, Podos J . Persistence of song types in Darwin's finches, Geospiza fortis, over four decades. Biol Lett. 2010; 6(5):589-92. PMC: 2936152. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0165. View

4.
Grant P, Grant B . Pedigrees, assortative mating and speciation in Darwin's finches. Proc Biol Sci. 2008; 275(1635):661-8. PMC: 2596835. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0898. View

5.
Payne , Woods , Sorenson . Imprinting and the origin of parasite-host species associations in brood-parasitic indigobirds, Vidua chalybeata. Anim Behav. 2000; 59(1):69-81. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1283. View