» Articles » PMID: 31989696

The Uses and Implications of Avian Vocalizations for Conservation Planning

Overview
Journal Conserv Biol
Date 2020 Jan 29
PMID 31989696
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There is a growing recognition that animal behavior can affect wildlife conservation, but there have been few direct studies of animal behavior in conservation programs. However, a great deal of existing behavioral research can be applied in the context of conservation. Research on avian vocalizations provides an excellent example. The conspicuous nature of the vocal behavior of birds makes it a useful tool for monitoring populations and measuring biodiversity, but the importance of vocalizations in conservation goes beyond monitoring. Geographic song variants with population-specific signatures, or dialects, can affect territory formation and mate choice. Dialects are influenced by cultural evolution and natural selection and changes can accumulate even during the timescale of conservation interventions, such as translocations, reintroductions, and ex situ breeding. Information from existing research into avian vocalizations can be used to improve conservation planning and increase the success of interventions. Vocalizations can confer a number of benefits for conservation practitioners through monitoring, providing baseline data on populations and individuals. However, the influence of cultural variation on territory formation, mate choice, and gene flow should be taken into account because cultural differences could create obstacles for conservation programs that bring birds from multiple populations together and so reduce the success of interventions.

Citing Articles

Frequency-dependence may moderate fitness costs linked to reduced bird song complexity.

Appleby D, Langmore N, Heinsohn R, Crates R R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(10):240766.

PMID: 39416229 PMC: 11479755. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.240766.


An acoustic detection dataset of birds (Aves) in montane forests using a deep learning approach.

Wu S, Ko J, Lin R, Tsai W, Chang H Biodivers Data J. 2024; 11:e97811.

PMID: 38327353 PMC: 10848598. DOI: 10.3897/BDJ.11.e97811.


Machine learning and statistical classification of birdsong link vocal acoustic features with phylogeny.

Rivera M, Edwards J, Hauber M, Woolley S Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):7076.

PMID: 37127781 PMC: 10151348. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-33825-5.


Using conservation genetics to prioritise management options for an endangered songbird.

Alves F, Banks S, Edworthy M, Stojanovic D, Langmore N, Heinsohn R Heredity (Edinb). 2023; 130(5):289-301.

PMID: 37016134 PMC: 10162965. DOI: 10.1038/s41437-023-00609-6.


Like Father Like Son: Cultural and Genetic Contributions to Song Inheritance in an Estrildid Finch.

Lewis R, Soma M, de Kort S, Gilman R Front Psychol. 2021; 12:654198.

PMID: 34149539 PMC: 8213215. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.654198.

References
1.
Petrinovich L, Patterson T, Baptista L . SONG DIALECTS AS BARRIERS TO DISPERSAL: A RE-EVALUATION. Evolution. 2017; 35(1):180-188. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1981.tb04871.x. View

2.
Wright T, Dahlin C, Salinas-Melgoza A . Stability and change in vocal dialects of the yellow-naped amazon. Anim Behav. 2009; 76(3):1017-1027. PMC: 2598431. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.03.025. View

3.
Suzuki K, Ikebuchi M, Okanoya K . The impact of domestication on fearfulness: a comparison of tonic immobility reactions in wild and domesticated finches. Behav Processes. 2013; 100:58-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.08.004. View

4.
Martin M, Shepherdson D . Role of familiarity and preference in reproductive success in ex situ breeding programs. Conserv Biol. 2012; 26(4):649-56. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01880.x. View

5.
Suzuki K, Yamada H, Kobayashi T, Okanoya K . Decreased fecal corticosterone levels due to domestication: a comparison between the white-backed Munia (Lonchura striata) and its domesticated strain, the Bengalese finch (Lonchura striata var. domestica) with a suggestion for complex song evolution. J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol. 2012; 317(9):561-70. DOI: 10.1002/jez.1748. View