» Articles » PMID: 21041056

Bridging the Physician and CAM Practitioner Communication Gap: Suggested Framework for Communication Between Physicians and CAM Practitioners Based on a Cross Professional Survey from Israel

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialties Health Services
Nursing
Date 2010 Nov 3
PMID 21041056
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Our study aimed to develop a framework to improve communication between physicians and CAM practitioners regarding mutual patients.

Methods: Following a modified Delphi process, we developed preliminary recommendations regarding communication between physicians and CAM practitioners. We then surveyed 473 physicians and 781 CAM practitioners regarding their opinions on these recommendations.

Results: High reliability and validity of the survey were found among the physicians and CAM practitioners (Cronbach's alpha score of .94 and .83, respectively). Physicians and CAM practitioners considered communication regarding mutual patients important (80% and 97%, respectively; P<.001). A medical/referral letter was the preferred communication mode. Physicians and CAM practitioners concurred on four elements that should be included in such a referral letter: conventional-CAM diagnosis with coherent terminology, possible conventional-CAM treatment interactions, description of the treatment plan and its goals, and quality issues regarding CAM supplements.

Conclusions: A practical framework for advancing physician-CAM practitioner communication is feasible, and may be applied in daily medical care with the goal of bridging the patient-physician-CAM practitioner communication gap.

Practice Implications: Communication between physicians and CAM practitioners regarding mutual patients is important. Establishing a framework for the mode and content of such communication is feasible.

Citing Articles

Interprofessional contact with conventional healthcare providers in oncology: a survey among complementary medicine practitioners.

Mentink M, Jansen J, Noordman J, van Vliet L, Busch M, van Dulmen S BMC Complement Med Ther. 2024; 24(1):285.

PMID: 39061012 PMC: 11282773. DOI: 10.1186/s12906-024-04563-6.


Exploring primary care physician feedback following an integrative oncology consultation.

Hauzer M, Grimberg R, Samuels N, Keshet Y, Mordechai A, Dagash J Support Care Cancer. 2023; 31(10):606.

PMID: 37787815 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08079-6.


A Qualitative Study Among Healthcare Providers on Risks Associated With the Use of Supportive Care for Cancer Treatment-Related Symptoms in Children and Adolescents.

Mora D, Kristoffersen A, Jong M, Hervik J, Stub T Integr Cancer Ther. 2023; 22:15347354231192959.

PMID: 37551913 PMC: 10411284. DOI: 10.1177/15347354231192959.


Lifestyle management in polycystic ovary syndrome - beyond diet and physical activity.

Cowan S, Lim S, Alycia C, Pirotta S, Thomson R, Gibson-Helm M BMC Endocr Disord. 2023; 23(1):14.

PMID: 36647089 PMC: 9841505. DOI: 10.1186/s12902-022-01208-y.


Integrative Oncology Education: An Emerging Competency for Oncology Providers.

Karim S, Benn R, Carlson L, Fouladbakhsh J, Greenlee H, Harris R Curr Oncol. 2021; 28(1):853-862.

PMID: 33578660 PMC: 7985783. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28010084.