» Articles » PMID: 21031161

Sensory Prediction or Motor Control? Application of Marr-albus Type Models of Cerebellar Function to Classical Conditioning

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2010 Oct 30
PMID 21031161
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Marr-Albus adaptive filter models of the cerebellum have been applied successfully to a range of sensory and motor control problems. Here we analyze their properties when applied to classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response in rabbits. We consider a system-level model of eyeblink conditioning based on the anatomy of the eyeblink circuitry, comprising an adaptive filter model of the cerebellum, a comparator model of the inferior olive and a linear dynamic model of the nictitating membrane plant. To our knowledge, this is the first model that explicitly includes all these principal components, in particular the motor plant that is vital for shaping and timing the behavioral response. Model assumptions and parameters were systematically investigated to disambiguate basic computational capacities of the model from features requiring tuning of properties and parameter values. Without such tuning, the model robustly reproduced a range of behaviors related to sensory prediction, by displaying appropriate trial-level associative learning effects for both single and multiple stimuli, including blocking and conditioned inhibition. In contrast, successful reproduction of the real-time motor behavior depended on appropriate specification of the plant, cerebellum and comparator models. Although some of these properties appear consistent with the system biology, fundamental questions remain about how the biological parameters are chosen if the cerebellar microcircuit applies a common computation to many distinct behavioral tasks. It is possible that the response profiles in classical conditioning of the eyeblink depend upon operant contingencies that have previously prevailed, for example in naturally occurring avoidance movements.

Citing Articles

A computational passage-of-time model of the cerebellar Purkinje cell in eyeblink conditioning.

Ricci M, Kim J, Johansson F Front Comput Neurosci. 2023; 17:1108346.

PMID: 36950506 PMC: 10025386. DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2023.1108346.


A biochemical mechanism for time-encoding memory formation within individual synapses of Purkinje cells.

Mandwal A, Orlandi J, Simon C, Davidsen J PLoS One. 2021; 16(5):e0251172.

PMID: 33961660 PMC: 8104431. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251172.


Absence of Parallel Fibre to Purkinje Cell LTD During Eyeblink Conditioning.

Johansson F, Jirenhed D, Rasmussen A, Zucca R, Hesslow G Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):14777.

PMID: 30283004 PMC: 6170427. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-32791-7.


Sequential Pattern Formation in the Cerebellar Granular Layer.

Bratby P, Sneyd J, Montgomery J Cerebellum. 2016; 16(2):438-449.

PMID: 27543118 DOI: 10.1007/s12311-016-0820-y.


Mechanisms for motor timing in the cerebellar cortex.

Johansson F, Hesslow G, Medina J Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2016; 8:53-59.

PMID: 26949723 PMC: 4774525. DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.01.013.


References
1.
van Ham J, Yeo C . Trigeminal inputs to eyeblink motoneurons in the rabbit. Exp Neurol. 1996; 142(2):244-57. DOI: 10.1006/exnr.1996.0195. View

2.
Medina J, Garcia K, Nores W, Taylor N, Mauk M . Timing mechanisms in the cerebellum: testing predictions of a large-scale computer simulation. J Neurosci. 2000; 20(14):5516-25. PMC: 6772322. View

3.
Dean P, Porrill J, Ekerot C, Jorntell H . The cerebellar microcircuit as an adaptive filter: experimental and computational evidence. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009; 11(1):30-43. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2756. View

4.
Medina J, Nores W, Mauk M . Inhibition of climbing fibres is a signal for the extinction of conditioned eyelid responses. Nature. 2002; 416(6878):330-3. DOI: 10.1038/416330a. View

5.
Zbarska S, Bloedel J, Bracha V . Cerebellar dysfunction explains the extinction-like abolition of conditioned eyeblinks after NBQX injections in the inferior olive. J Neurosci. 2008; 28(1):10-20. PMC: 6671149. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3403-07.2008. View