» Articles » PMID: 20957164

Preliminary Biocompatible Evaluation of Nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 Composite Porous Membrane

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2010 Oct 20
PMID 20957164
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 (nHA/PA66) composite with good bioactivity and osteoconductivity was employed to develop a novel porous membrane with asymmetric structure for guided bone regeneration (GBR). In order to test material cytotoxicity and to investigate surface-dependent responses of bone-forming cells, the morphology, proliferation, and cell cycle of bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) of rats cultured on the prepared membrane were determined. The polygonal and fusiform shape of BMSCs was observed by scanning electronic microscopy (SEM). The proliferation of BMSCs cultured on nHA/PA66 membrane tested by the MTT method (MTT: [3-{4,5-dimethylthiazol-2yl}-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazoliumbromide]) was higher than that of negative control groups for 1 and 4 days' incubation and had no significant difference for 7 and 11 days' culture. The results of cell cycle also suggested that the membrane has no negative influence on cell division. The nHA/PA66 membranes were then implanted into subcutaneous sites of nine Sprague Dawley rats. The wounds and implant sites were free from suppuration and necrosis in all periods. All nHA/PA66 membranes were surrounded by a fibrous capsule with decreasing thickness 1 to 8 weeks postoperatively. In conclusion, the results of the in vitro and in vivo studies reveal that nHA/PA66 membrane has excellent biocompatibility and indicate its use in guided tissue regeneration (GTR) or GBR.

Citing Articles

Histologic and Histomorphometric Comparison between Sintered Nanohydroxyapatite and Anorganic Bovine Xenograft in Maxillary Sinus Grafting: A Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Stacchi C, Lombardi T, Oreglia F, Alberghini Maltoni A, Traini T Biomed Res Int. 2017; 2017:9489825.

PMID: 28845435 PMC: 5563399. DOI: 10.1155/2017/9489825.


Nano-hydroxyapatite and its applications in preventive, restorative and regenerative dentistry: a review of literature.

Pepla E, Besharat L, Palaia G, Tenore G, Migliau G Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2014; 5(3):108-14.

PMID: 25506416 PMC: 4252862.


Development of nanofluorapatite polymer-based composite for bioactive orthopedic implants and prostheses.

Hu G, Wang H, Yao X, Bi D, Zhu G, Tang S Int J Nanomedicine. 2014; 9:3875-84.

PMID: 25143735 PMC: 4138000. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S65682.


In vitro and in vivo evaluations of nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66/glass fibre (n-HA/PA66/GF) as a novel bioactive bone screw.

Su B, Peng X, Jiang D, Wu J, Qiao B, Li W PLoS One. 2013; 8(7):e68342.

PMID: 23861888 PMC: 3704538. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068342.

References
1.
Lundgren A, Sennerby L, Lundgren D . Guided jaw-bone regeneration using an experimental rabbit model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998; 27(2):135-40. DOI: 10.1016/s0901-5027(98)80313-5. View

2.
Nociti Jr F, Machado M, Stefani C, Sallum E, Sallum A . Absorbable versus nonabsorbable membranes and bone grafts in the treatment of ligature-induced peri-implantitis defects in dogs. Part I. A clinical investigation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001; 12(2):115-20. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012002115.x. View

3.
Kim K, Jeong L, Park H, Shin S, Park W, Lee S . Biological efficacy of silk fibroin nanofiber membranes for guided bone regeneration. J Biotechnol. 2005; 120(3):327-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2005.06.033. View

4.
Li J, Zuo Y, Cheng X, Yang W, Wang H, Li Y . Preparation and characterization of nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 composite GBR membrane with asymmetric porous structure. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008; 20(5):1031-8. DOI: 10.1007/s10856-008-3664-2. View

5.
Zitzmann N, Naef R, Scharer P . Resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes in combination with Bio-Oss for guided bone regeneration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998; 12(6):844-52. View