» Articles » PMID: 20956296

Multiple Mating and Its Relationship to Alternative Modes of Gestation in Male-pregnant Versus Female-pregnant Fish Species

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2010 Oct 20
PMID 20956296
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We construct a verbal and graphical theory (the "fecundity-limitation hypothesis") about how constraints on the brooding space for embryos probably truncate individual fecundity in male-pregnant and female-pregnant species in ways that should differentially influence selection pressures for multiple mating by males or by females. We then review the empirical literature on genetically deduced rates of multiple mating by the embryo-brooding parent in various fish species with three alternative categories of pregnancy: internal gestation by males, internal gestation by females, and external gestation (in nests) by males. Multiple mating by the brooding gender was common in all three forms of pregnancy. However, rates of multiple mating as well as mate numbers for the pregnant parent averaged higher in species with external as compared with internal male pregnancy, and also for dams in female-pregnant species versus sires in male-pregnant species. These outcomes are all consistent with the theory that different types of pregnancy have predictable consequences for a parent's brood space, its effective fecundity, its opportunities and rewards for producing half-sib clutches, and thereby its exposure to selection pressures for seeking multiple mates. Overall, we try to fit these fecundity-limitation phenomena into a broader conceptual framework for mating-system evolution that also includes anisogamy, sexual-selection gradients, parental investment, and other selective factors that can influence the relative proclivities of males versus females to seek multiple sexual partners.

Citing Articles

The logic of conventional and reversed Bateman gradients.

Lehtonen J, Parker G, Whittington C Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2034):20242126.

PMID: 39501887 PMC: 11538987. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2126.


An inconvenient tooth: Evaluating female choice in multiple paternity using an evolutionarily and ecologically important vertebrate clade.

Lyons K, Kacev D, Mull C Mol Ecol. 2021; 30(7):1574-1593.

PMID: 33586211 PMC: 8251896. DOI: 10.1111/mec.15844.


Multiple paternity and number of offspring in mammals.

Dobson F, Abebe A, Correia H, Kasumo C, Zinner B Proc Biol Sci. 2018; 285(1891).

PMID: 30429308 PMC: 6253375. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.2042.


Multiple mating and reproductive skew in parental and introgressed females of the live-bearing fish Xiphophorus birchmanni.

Paczolt K, Passow C, Delclos P, Kindsvater H, Jones A, Rosenthal G J Hered. 2014; 106(1):57-66.

PMID: 25433083 PMC: 4357810. DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esu066.


High degree of multiple paternity in the viviparous Shiner Perch, , a fish with long-term female sperm storage.

Liu J, Avise J Mar Biol. 2014; 158(4):893-901.

PMID: 24391263 PMC: 3873152. DOI: 10.1007/s00227-010-1616-0.


References
1.
Jones A, Ardren W . Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations. Mol Ecol. 2003; 12(10):2511-23. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01928.x. View

2.
Jones A, Avise J . Mating systems and sexual selection in male-pregnant pipefishes and seahorses: insights from microsatellite-based studies of maternity. J Hered. 2001; 92(2):150-8. DOI: 10.1093/jhered/92.2.150. View

3.
Parker G, Baker R, SMITH V . The origin and evolution of gamete dimorphism and the male-female phenomenon. J Theor Biol. 1972; 36(3):529-53. DOI: 10.1016/0022-5193(72)90007-0. View

4.
Mobley K, Amundsen T, Forsgren E, Svensson P, Jones A . Multiple mating and a low incidence of cuckoldry for nest-holding males in the two-spotted goby, Gobiusculus flavescens. BMC Evol Biol. 2009; 9:6. PMC: 2631507. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-9-6. View

5.
Jones A, Ostlund-Nilsson S, Avise J . A MICROSATELLITE ASSESSMENT OF SNEAKED FERTILIZATIONS AND EGG THIEVERY IN THE FIFTEENSPINE STICKLEBACK. Evolution. 2017; 52(3):848-858. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb03709.x. View