» Articles » PMID: 17060640

Good Genes Sexual Selection in Nature

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2006 Oct 25
PMID 17060640
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Whether the mate sampling and choice performed by females in nature influences offspring performance is a controversial issue in theory and an open empirical question. Pronghorn (Antilocapra americana) females engage in an obvious and energetically expensive mate sampling process to identify vigorous males. Although individual females sample independently, their choices converge on a small proportion of males that sire most young. Offspring of attractive males were more likely to survive to weaning and to age classes as late as 5 years, resulting in a selection differential, calculated by expected differences in lifetime number of offspring weaned, of 0.32 against random mating. Enhanced survival to weaning appeared to be accomplished by faster growth rates. Females compensated for matings with a less attractive mate by elevating rates of milk delivery to their young. Because pronghorn males do not have costly ornaments, we conclude that female choice for good genes can exist in the absence of ornaments. Furthermore, female choice may be important and unrecognized as a force that can lower population genetic load.

Citing Articles

Females increase reproductive investment when mated to less sexually attractive males in a serially monogamous fish.

Lin T, Liu X, Li S, Zhang D, Shen F, Jiang K Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):19020.

PMID: 39152306 PMC: 11329643. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-70007-3.


The suppression of a selfish genetic element increases a male's mating success in a fly.

Lyth S, Betancourt A, Price T, Verspoor R Ecol Evol. 2023; 13(11):e10719.

PMID: 37964789 PMC: 10641306. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10719.


Evolution of Human Brain Left-Right Asymmetry: Old Genes with New Functions.

Wang J, Ma S, Yu P, He X Mol Biol Evol. 2023; 40(9).

PMID: 37561991 PMC: 10473864. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msad181.


Male competition reverses female preference for male chemical cues.

Vilella-Pacheco Z, Mitchem L, Formica V, Brodie 3rd E Ecol Evol. 2021; 11(9):4532-4541.

PMID: 33976828 PMC: 8093714. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7348.


Drosophila Sexual Attractiveness in Older Males Is Mediated by Their Microbiota.

Heys C, Lize A, Lewis Z, Price T Microorganisms. 2020; 8(2).

PMID: 31991698 PMC: 7074797. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8020168.


References
1.
Drickamer , Gowaty , Holmes . Free female mate choice in house mice affects reproductive success and offspring viability and performance. Anim Behav. 2000; 59(2):371-378. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1316. View

2.
Sheldon . Differential allocation: tests, mechanisms and implications. Trends Ecol Evol. 2000; 15(10):397-402. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(00)01953-4. View

3.
Jones A, Ardren W . Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations. Mol Ecol. 2003; 12(10):2511-23. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01928.x. View

4.
Evans J, Kelley J, Bisazza A, Finazzo E, Pilastro A . Sire attractiveness influences offspring performance in guppies. Proc Biol Sci. 2004; 271(1552):2035-42. PMC: 1691832. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2815. View

5.
Neff B, Pitcher T . Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes. Mol Ecol. 2005; 14(1):19-38. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02395.x. View