» Articles » PMID: 20951044

Effectively Reducing Sensory Eye Dominance with a Push-pull Perceptual Learning Protocol

Overview
Journal Curr Biol
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Biology
Date 2010 Oct 19
PMID 20951044
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Much knowledge of sensory cortical plasticity is gleaned from perceptual learning studies that improve visual performance [1-7]. Although the improvements are likely caused by modifications of excitatory and inhibitory neural networks, most studies were not primarily designed to differentiate their relative contributions. Here we designed a novel push-pull training protocol to reduce sensory eye dominance (SED), a condition that is mainly caused by unbalanced interocular inhibition [8-10]. During the training, an attention cue presented to the weak eye precedes the binocular competitive stimulation. The cue stimulates the weak eye (push) while causing interocular inhibition of the strong eye (pull). We found that this push-pull protocol reduces SED (shifts the balance toward the weak eye) and improves stereopsis more so than the push-only protocol, which solely stimulates the weak eye without inhibiting the strong eye. The stronger learning effect with the push-pull training than the push-only training underscores the crucial involvement of a putative inhibitory mechanism in sensory plasticity. The design principle of the push-pull protocol can potentially lend itself as an effective, noninvasive treatment of amblyopia.

Citing Articles

Contextual Binocular Imbalance Impairs Local Stereopsis.

Jiang R, Chang S, Yu X, Meng M Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2025; 66(3):6.

PMID: 40035726 PMC: 11892528. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.66.3.6.


Monocular eye-cueing shifts eye balance in amblyopia.

Wong S, Hess R, Mullen K J Vis. 2025; 25(1):6.

PMID: 39775723 PMC: 11724371. DOI: 10.1167/jov.25.1.6.


Prediction of Robotic Anastomosis Competency Evaluation (RACE) metrics during vesico-urethral anastomosis using electroencephalography, eye-tracking, and machine learning.

Shafiei S, Shadpour S, Mohler J, Rashidi P, Toussi M, Liu Q Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):14611.

PMID: 38918593 PMC: 11199555. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-65648-3.


Collective plasticity of binocular interactions in the adult visual system.

Wang M, McGraw P, Ledgeway T Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):10494.

PMID: 38714660 PMC: 11076462. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57276-8.


Effects of Monocular Flicker on Binocular Imbalance in Amblyopic and Nonamblyopic Adults.

Lu Y, Zou L, Wang W, Chen R, Qu J, Zhou J Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024; 65(3):33.

PMID: 38530301 PMC: 10982911. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.65.3.33.


References
1.
Levi D, Li R . Perceptual learning as a potential treatment for amblyopia: a mini-review. Vision Res. 2009; 49(21):2535-49. PMC: 2764839. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.02.010. View

2.
Hensch T, Fagiolini M, Mataga N, Stryker M, Baekkeskov S, Kash S . Local GABA circuit control of experience-dependent plasticity in developing visual cortex. Science. 1998; 282(5393):1504-8. PMC: 2851625. DOI: 10.1126/science.282.5393.1504. View

3.
Mollon J, Danilova M . Three remarks on perceptual learning. Spat Vis. 1996; 10(1):51-8. DOI: 10.1163/156856896x00051. View

4.
Levi D, Polat U . Neural plasticity in adults with amblyopia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996; 93(13):6830-4. PMC: 39113. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.93.13.6830. View

5.
Ramachandran V, Braddick O . Orientation-specific learning in stereopsis. Perception. 1973; 2(3):371-6. DOI: 10.1068/p020371. View