» Articles » PMID: 15731350

The Time Course and Specificity of Perceptual Deterioration

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2005 Feb 26
PMID 15731350
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Repeated within-day testing on a texture discrimination task leads to retinotopically specific decreases in performance. Although perceptual learning has been shown to be highly specific to the retinotopic location and characteristics of the trained stimulus, the specificity of perceptual deterioration has not been studied. We investigated the similarities between learning and deterioration by examining whether deterioration transfers to new distractor or target orientations or to the untrained eye. Participants performed a texture discrimination task in three one-hour sessions. We tested the specificity of deterioration in the final session by switching either the orientation of the background or the target elements by 90 degrees. We found that performance deteriorated steadily both within and across the first two sessions and was specific to the target but not the distractor orientation. In a separate experiment, we found that deterioration transferred to the untrained eye. Changes in performance were independent of reported sleepiness and awareness of stimulus changes, arguing against the possibility that perceptual deterioration is due to general fatigue. Rather, we hypothesize that perceptual deterioration may be caused by changes in the ability for attention to selectively enhance the responses of relatively low-level orientation-selective sensory neurons, possibly within the primary visual cortex. Further, the differences in specificity profiles between learning and deterioration suggest separate underlying mechanisms that occur within the same cortical area.

Citing Articles

Evidence that anterograde learning interference depends on the stage of learning of the interferer: blocked versus interleaved training.

Ning R, Wright B Learn Mem. 2023; 30(5-6):101-109.

PMID: 37419679 PMC: 10353258. DOI: 10.1101/lm.053710.122.


Neural fatigue by passive induction: repeated stimulus exposure results in cognitive fatigue and altered representations in task-relevant networks.

Ioannucci S, Chirokoff V, Dilharreguy B, Ozenne V, Chanraud S, Zenon A Commun Biol. 2023; 6(1):142.

PMID: 36737639 PMC: 9898557. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-04527-5.


Decrease in signal-related activity by visual training and repetitive visual stimulation.

Marzoll A, Shibata K, Toyoizumi T, Chavva I, Watanabe T iScience. 2022; 25(12):105492.

PMID: 36419854 PMC: 9676190. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105492.


Behavioral gain following isolation of attention.

Edwards G, Berestova A, Battelli L Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):19329.

PMID: 34588526 PMC: 8481494. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-98670-w.


Effects of daily training amount on visual motion perceptual learning.

Song Y, Chen N, Fang F J Vis. 2021; 21(4):6.

PMID: 33848320 PMC: 8054621. DOI: 10.1167/jov.21.4.6.


References
1.
Karni A, Sagi D . Where practice makes perfect in texture discrimination: evidence for primary visual cortex plasticity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991; 88(11):4966-70. PMC: 51788. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.88.11.4966. View

2.
Karni A, Sagi D . The time course of learning a visual skill. Nature. 1993; 365(6443):250-2. DOI: 10.1038/365250a0. View

3.
Mednick S, Nakayama K, Cantero J, Atienza M, Levin A, Pathak N . The restorative effect of naps on perceptual deterioration. Nat Neurosci. 2002; 5(7):677-81. DOI: 10.1038/nn864. View

4.
Mollon J, Danilova M . Three remarks on perceptual learning. Spat Vis. 1996; 10(1):51-8. DOI: 10.1163/156856896x00051. View

5.
Roge J, Pebayle T, Lambilliotte E, Spitzenstetter F, Giselbrecht D, Muzet A . Influence of age, speed and duration of monotonous driving task in traffic on the driver's useful visual field. Vision Res. 2004; 44(23):2737-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.05.026. View