» Articles » PMID: 20942918

Functional Analysis: Evaluation of Response Intensities--tailoring ANOVA for Lists of Expression Subsets

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2010 Oct 15
PMID 20942918
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Microarray data is frequently used to characterize the expression profile of a whole genome and to compare the characteristics of that genome under several conditions. Geneset analysis methods have been described previously to analyze the expression values of several genes related by known biological criteria (metabolic pathway, pathology signature, co-regulation by a common factor, etc.) at the same time and the cost of these methods allows for the use of more values to help discover the underlying biological mechanisms.

Results: As several methods assume different null hypotheses, we propose to reformulate the main question that biologists seek to answer. To determine which genesets are associated with expression values that differ between two experiments, we focused on three ad hoc criteria: expression levels, the direction of individual gene expression changes (up or down regulation), and correlations between genes. We introduce the FAERI methodology, tailored from a two-way ANOVA to examine these criteria. The significance of the results was evaluated according to the self-contained null hypothesis, using label sampling or by inferring the null distribution from normally distributed random data. Evaluations performed on simulated data revealed that FAERI outperforms currently available methods for each type of set tested. We then applied the FAERI method to analyze three real-world datasets on hypoxia response. FAERI was able to detect more genesets than other methodologies, and the genesets selected were coherent with current knowledge of cellular response to hypoxia. Moreover, the genesets selected by FAERI were confirmed when the analysis was repeated on two additional related datasets.

Conclusions: The expression values of genesets are associated with several biological effects. The underlying mathematical structure of the genesets allows for analysis of data from several genes at the same time. Focusing on expression levels, the direction of the expression changes, and correlations, we showed that two-step data reduction allowed us to significantly improve the performance of geneset analysis using a modified two-way ANOVA procedure, and to detect genesets that current methods fail to detect.

Citing Articles

Meta-Analysis of Microarray Data of Rainbow Trout Fry Gonad Differentiation Modulated by Ethynylestradiol.

Depiereux S, Le Gac F, De Meulder B, Pierre M, Helaers R, Guiguen Y PLoS One. 2015; 10(9):e0135799.

PMID: 26379055 PMC: 4574709. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135799.


Adaptation of a Bioinformatics Microarray Analysis Workflow for a Toxicogenomic Study in Rainbow Trout.

Depiereux S, De Meulder B, Bareke E, Berger F, Le Gac F, Depiereux E PLoS One. 2015; 10(7):e0128598.

PMID: 26186543 PMC: 4506078. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128598.


Meta-analysis and gene set analysis of archived microarrays suggest implication of the spliceosome in metastatic and hypoxic phenotypes.

De Meulder B, Berger F, Bareke E, Depiereux S, Michiels C, Depiereux E PLoS One. 2014; 9(1):e86699.

PMID: 24497970 PMC: 3908947. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086699.


Serum proteomic signature of human chagasic patients for the identification of novel potential protein biomarkers of disease.

Wen J, Zago M, Nunez S, Gupta S, Burgos F, Garg N Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012; 11(8):435-52.

PMID: 22543060 PMC: 3412973. DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M112.017640.


Cardiac-oxidized antigens are targets of immune recognition by antibodies and potential molecular determinants in chagas disease pathogenesis.

Dhiman M, Zago M, Nunez S, Amoroso A, Rementeria H, Dousset P PLoS One. 2012; 7(1):e28449.

PMID: 22238578 PMC: 3251564. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028449.


References
1.
Kim S, Volsky D . PAGE: parametric analysis of gene set enrichment. BMC Bioinformatics. 2005; 6:144. PMC: 1183189. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-6-144. View

2.
Edelman E, Porrello A, Guinney J, Balakumaran B, Bild A, Febbo P . Analysis of sample set enrichment scores: assaying the enrichment of sets of genes for individual samples in genome-wide expression profiles. Bioinformatics. 2006; 22(14):e108-16. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl231. View

3.
Thomas J, Olson J, Tapscott S, Zhao L . An efficient and robust statistical modeling approach to discover differentially expressed genes using genomic expression profiles. Genome Res. 2001; 11(7):1227-36. PMC: 311075. DOI: 10.1101/gr.165101. View

4.
Man M, Wang X, Wang Y . POWER_SAGE: comparing statistical tests for SAGE experiments. Bioinformatics. 2001; 16(11):953-9. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.11.953. View

5.
Larsson O, Wahlestedt C, Timmons J . Considerations when using the significance analysis of microarrays (SAM) algorithm. BMC Bioinformatics. 2005; 6:129. PMC: 1173086. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-6-129. View