» Articles » PMID: 20935246

Arachidonic Acid: an Evolutionarily Conserved Signaling Molecule Modulates Plant Stress Signaling Networks

Overview
Journal Plant Cell
Specialties Biology
Cell Biology
Date 2010 Oct 12
PMID 20935246
Citations 73
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Fatty acid structure affects cellular activities through changes in membrane lipid composition and the generation of a diversity of bioactive derivatives. Eicosapolyenoic acids are released into plants upon infection by oomycete pathogens, suggesting they may elicit plant defenses. We exploited transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana plants (designated EP) producing eicosadienoic, eicosatrienoic, and arachidonic acid (AA), aimed at mimicking pathogen release of these compounds. We also examined their effect on biotic stress resistance by challenging EP plants with fungal, oomycete, and bacterial pathogens and an insect pest. EP plants exhibited enhanced resistance to all biotic challenges, except they were more susceptible to bacteria than the wild type. Levels of jasmonic acid (JA) were elevated and levels of salicylic acid (SA) were reduced in EP plants. Altered expression of JA and SA pathway genes in EP plants shows that eicosapolyenoic acids effectively modulate stress-responsive transcriptional networks. Exogenous application of various fatty acids to wild-type and JA-deficient mutants confirmed AA as the signaling molecule. Moreover, AA treatment elicited heightened expression of general stress-responsive genes. Importantly, tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) leaves treated with AA exhibited reduced susceptibility to Botrytis cinerea infection, confirming AA signaling in other plants. These studies support the role of AA, an ancient metazoan signaling molecule, in eliciting plant stress and defense signaling networks.

Citing Articles

Comparative Metabolite Profiling Between and Other by Untargeted UHPLC-MS/MS.

Ma J, Chen Z, Malik K, Li C Biology (Basel). 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 40001886 PMC: 11851418. DOI: 10.3390/biology14020118.


Rhizobacteria protective hydrogel to promote plant growth and adaption to acidic soil.

Feng Q, Luo Y, Liang M, Cao Y, Wang L, Liu C Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):1684.

PMID: 39956869 PMC: 11830790. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-56988-3.


Non-targeted metabolomics reveals fatty acid and associated pathways driving resistance to whitefly and tomato leafminer in wild tomato accessions.

Kumaraswamy S, Yogendra K, Sotelo-Cardona P, Shivanna A, Hemalatha S, Mohan M Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):3754.

PMID: 39885264 PMC: 11782529. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-86191-9.


Integrated analysis of physiological and metabolic data uncovers essential dynamic mechanisms involved in the maturation of cigar tobacco leaves.

Liu H, Chi X, Yang J, Ding G, Xu F, Yang C Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):31330.

PMID: 39733066 PMC: 11682304. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-82859-w.


Beneficial Soil Fungus Kills Predatory Nematodes with Dehydropeptides Translocating into the Animal Gut.

Buttner H, Rassbach J, Schultz C, Popp J, Gressler M, Hertweck C J Am Chem Soc. 2024; 146(50):34702-34710.

PMID: 39652677 PMC: 11664578. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.4c12989.


References
1.
Chehab E, Kaspi R, Savchenko T, Rowe H, Negre-Zakharov F, Kliebenstein D . Distinct roles of jasmonates and aldehydes in plant-defense responses. PLoS One. 2008; 3(4):e1904. PMC: 2271129. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001904. View

2.
Pegorier J, Le May C, Girard J . Control of gene expression by fatty acids. J Nutr. 2004; 134(9):2444S-2449S. DOI: 10.1093/jn/134.9.2444S. View

3.
Tjamos E, Kucacute J . Inhibition of steroid glycoalkaloid accumulation by arachidonic and eicosapentaenoic acids in potato. Science. 1982; 217(4559):542-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.217.4559.542. View

4.
Staswick P, Yuen G, Lehman C . Jasmonate signaling mutants of Arabidopsis are susceptible to the soil fungus Pythium irregulare. Plant J. 1998; 15(6):747-54. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00265.x. View

5.
Bostock R . Signal crosstalk and induced resistance: straddling the line between cost and benefit. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2005; 43:545-80. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.41.052002.095505. View