» Articles » PMID: 18284339

Left Posterior Temporal Regions Are Sensitive to Auditory Categorization

Overview
Journal J Cogn Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2008 Feb 21
PMID 18284339
Citations 66
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent studies suggest that the left superior temporal gyrus and sulcus (LSTG/S) play a role in speech perception, although the precise function of these areas remains unclear. Here, we test the hypothesis that regions in the LSTG/S play a role in the categorization of speech phonemes, irrespective of the acoustic properties of the sounds and prior experience of the listener with them. We examined changes in functional magnetic resonance imaging brain activation related to a perceptual shift from nonphonetic to phonetic analysis of sine-wave speech analogs. Subjects performed an identification task before scanning and a discrimination task during scanning with phonetic (P) and nonphonetic (N) sine-wave sounds, both before (Pre) and after (Post) being exposed to the phonetic properties of the P sounds. Behaviorally, experience with the P sounds induced categorical identification of these sounds. In the PostP > PreP and PostP > PostN contrasts, an area in the posterior LSTG/S was activated. For both P and N sounds, the activation in this region was correlated with the degree of categorical identification in individual subjects. The results suggest that these areas in the posterior LSTG/S are sensitive neither to the acoustic properties of speech nor merely to the presence of phonetic information, but rather to the listener's awareness of category representations for auditory inputs.

Citing Articles

Acoustic and phonemic processing are impaired in individuals with aphasia.

Kries J, De Clercq P, Lemmens R, Francart T, Vandermosten M Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):11208.

PMID: 37433805 PMC: 10336064. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-37624-w.


Right Posterior Temporal Cortex Supports Integration of Phonetic and Talker Information.

Luthra S, Magnuson J, Myers E Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2023; 4(1):145-177.

PMID: 37229142 PMC: 10205075. DOI: 10.1162/nol_a_00091.


The Role of the Right Hemisphere in Processing Phonetic Variability Between Talkers.

Luthra S Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2023; 2(1):138-151.

PMID: 37213418 PMC: 10174361. DOI: 10.1162/nol_a_00028.


Intelligibility improves perception of timing changes in speech.

Zoefel B, Gilbert R, Davis M PLoS One. 2023; 18(1):e0279024.

PMID: 36634109 PMC: 9836318. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279024.


Functional Plasticity Coupled With Structural Predispositions in Auditory Cortex Shape Successful Music Category Learning.

Mankel K, Shrestha U, Tipirneni-Sajja A, Bidelman G Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:897239.

PMID: 35837119 PMC: 9274125. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.897239.


References
1.
Uppenkamp S, Johnsrude I, Norris D, Marslen-Wilson W, Patterson R . Locating the initial stages of speech-sound processing in human temporal cortex. Neuroimage. 2006; 31(3):1284-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.004. View

2.
Wolmetz M, Poeppel D, Rapp B . What does the right hemisphere know about phoneme categories?. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010; 23(3):552-69. PMC: 4471482. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21495. View

3.
Culham J, Kanwisher N . Neuroimaging of cognitive functions in human parietal cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2001; 11(2):157-63. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-4388(00)00191-4. View

4.
OLDFIELD R . The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971; 9(1):97-113. DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4. View

5.
Mottonen R, Calvert G, Jaaskelainen I, Matthews P, Thesen T, Tuomainen J . Perceiving identical sounds as speech or non-speech modulates activity in the left posterior superior temporal sulcus. Neuroimage. 2005; 30(2):563-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.10.002. View