Effect of Low-amplitude Two-dimensional Radial Strain at Left Ventricular Pacing Sites on Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Left ventricular (LV) lead placement to areas of scar has detrimental effects on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Speckle-tracking radial two-dimensional strain offers assessment of the extent of regional myocardial deformation. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of LV lead placement at areas of low-amplitude strain on CRT response.
Methods: The optimal cutoff of radial strain amplitude at the LV pacing site associated with an unfavorable CRT response was determined in a derivation group (n = 65) and then tested in a second consecutive validation group (n = 75) of patients with heart failure. Patients had concordant LV leads if placed at the most delayed site, and dyssynchrony was defined as anteroseptal to posterior delay ≥ 130 msec. CRT response was defined as a ≥15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume at 6 months.
Results: In the derivation group, a derived cutoff for radial strain amplitude of <9.8% defined low-amplitude segments (LAS) and had a high specificity but low sensitivity for predicting LV reverse remodeling, suggesting a strong negative predictive value. In the validation group, compared with patients without LAS at the LV pacing site, in patients with LAS (n = 16), CRT response was significantly lower (62.7% vs 31.3%, P < .05). By multivariate analysis, LV lead concordance and the absence of an LAS at the LV pacing site but not dyssynchrony were significantly related to CRT response.
Conclusion: LV lead placement over segments with two-dimensional radial strain amplitudes <9.8% is associated with poor outcomes of CRT.
Wouters P, van Lieshout C, van Dijk V, Delnoy P, Doevendans P, Cramer M BMJ Open. 2021; 11(10):e054115.
PMID: 34697125 PMC: 8547507. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054115.
Keilegavlen H, Schuster P, Hovstad T, Faerestrand S J Arrhythm. 2021; 37(1):212-218.
PMID: 33664905 PMC: 7896457. DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12450.
Current role of echocardiography in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Mele D, Bertini M, Malagu M, Nardozza M, Ferrari R Heart Fail Rev. 2017; 22(6):699-722.
PMID: 28714039 DOI: 10.1007/s10741-017-9636-1.
Behar J, Rajani R, Pourmorteza A, Preston R, Razeghi O, Niederer S Heart Rhythm. 2017; 14(9):1364-1372.
PMID: 28479514 PMC: 5575356. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.04.041.
Clinical utility of speckle-tracking echocardiography in cardiac resynchronisation therapy.
Khan S, Klettas D, Kapetanakis S, Monaghan M Echo Res Pract. 2016; 3(1):R1-R11.
PMID: 27249816 PMC: 5402657. DOI: 10.1530/ERP-15-0032.