» Articles » PMID: 20884465

Consumers' Use of Web-based Information and Their Decisions About Multiplex Genetic Susceptibility Testing

Overview
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2010 Oct 2
PMID 20884465
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Few data exist to inform concerns raised by online direct-to-consumer marketing of genetic susceptibility tests, such as those offered by commercial entities like 23andme, Navigenics, and DNA Direct. The Multiplex Initiative, a population-based study of healthy adults, provides the first opportunity to evaluate how use of a Web-based decision tool that conveyed information about a genetic susceptibility test influenced individuals' test decisions.

Objective: To inform the ongoing debate over whether individuals offered genetic susceptibility testing without the involvement of a health care provider (eg, through direct-to-consumer testing) can make informed decisions about testing when guided by online decision aids.

Methods: Participants were 526 members of a large health maintenance organization aged 25 to 40 years old who visited a study website. Multivariate logistic regression models were tested to examine the association of website usage with downstream test decisions.

Results: Participants viewed an average of 2.9 of the 4 pages introducing the multiplex test, 2.2 of the 8 pages describing the health conditions, and 3.2 of the 15 pages describing the genes. For each page viewed, participants were more likely to describe their decision-making as easy (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.07) and to decide to be tested (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.05-1.11).

Conclusions: Healthy adults in this study perceived Web-based genomic information presented using evidence-based communications approaches to be helpful in supporting both decisions to test and not to test. Continued research is needed to ensure that these results generalize to target groups with lower literacy and less Internet savvy.

Citing Articles

The Risk Information and Skin-cancer Education for Undergraduate Prevention (RISE-UP) Study: Protocol for a Trial of Personalized Sun Protection Interventions for Skin Cancer Prevention among Undergraduate Students.

Wu Y, Woodside L, Kaphingst K, Jensen J, Hamilton J, Kohlmann W Contemp Clin Trials. 2024; 147:107728.

PMID: 39491719 PMC: 11620905. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107728.


Negative results from DNA-based population screening for adult-onset diseases: the recipients' experience.

Russo F, Chatterjee D, DeMaria N, Florido M, Marasa M, Sabatello M J Community Genet. 2024; 15(6):653-664.

PMID: 39373866 PMC: 11645380. DOI: 10.1007/s12687-024-00736-5.


Online Provision of and Health Information: A Search Engine Driven Systematic Web-Based Analysis.

Gootzen T, Kalra A, Sarig K, Sobocan M, Oxley S, Dworschak N Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(13).

PMID: 39001386 PMC: 11240379. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16132324.


Genetics Adviser: a protocol for a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial evaluating a digital platform for genetics service delivery.

Shickh S, Hirjikaka D, Clausen M, Kodida R, Mighton C, Reble E BMJ Open. 2022; 12(4):e060899.

PMID: 35487723 PMC: 9058789. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060899.


In-vivo design feedback and perceived utility of a genetically-informed smoking risk tool among current smokers in the community.

Bourdon J, Dorsey A, Zalik M, Pietka A, Salyer P, Bray M BMC Med Genomics. 2021; 14(1):139.

PMID: 34039360 PMC: 8152342. DOI: 10.1186/s12920-021-00976-1.


References
1.
Birru M, Monaco V, Charles L, Drew H, Njie V, Bierria T . Internet usage by low-literacy adults seeking health information: an observational analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2004; 6(3):e25. PMC: 1550604. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.6.3.e25. View

2.
Ropka M, Wenzel J, Phillips E, Siadaty M, Philbrick J . Uptake rates for breast cancer genetic testing: a systematic review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006; 15(5):840-55. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0002. View

3.
Ensenauer R, Michels V, Reinke S . Genetic testing: practical, ethical, and counseling considerations. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005; 80(1):63-73. DOI: 10.1016/S0025-6196(11)62960-1. View

4.
Goddard K, Robitaille J, Dowling N, Parrado A, Fishman J, Bradley L . Health-related direct-to-consumer genetic tests: a public health assessment and analysis of practices related to Internet-based tests for risk of thrombosis. Public Health Genomics. 2008; 12(2):92-104. PMC: 2790792. DOI: 10.1159/000176794. View

5.
Johnson J, Case D, Andrews J, Allard S . Genomics--the perfect information-seeking research problem. J Health Commun. 2005; 10(4):323-9. DOI: 10.1080/10810730590950048. View