Validity of British Thoracic Society Guidance (the CRB-65 Rule) for Predicting the Severity of Pneumonia in General Practice: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview

Journal Br J Gen Pract

Specialty Public Health

Date 2010 Oct 2

PMID 20883616

Citations 34

Authors

Maggie McNally

James Curtain

Kirsty K OBrien

Borislav D Dimitrov

Tom Fahey

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The CRB-65 score is a clinical prediction rule that grades the severity of community-acquired pneumonia in terms of 30-day mortality.

Aim: The study sought to validate CRB-65 and assess its clinical value in community and hospital settings.

Design Of Study: Systematic review and meta-analysis of validation studies of CRB-65.

Method: Medline (1966 to June 2009), Embase (1988 to November 2008), British Nursing Index (BNI) and PsychINFO were searched, using a diagnostic accuracy search filter combined with subject-specific terms. The derived (index) rule was used as a predictive model and applied to all validation studies. Comparison was made between the observed and predicted number of deaths stratified by risk group (low, intermediate, and high) and setting of care (community or hospital). Pooled results are presented as risk ratios (RRs) in terms of over-prediction (RR>1) or under-prediction (RR<1) of 30-day mortality.

Results: Fourteen validation studies totalling 397 875 patients are included. CRB-65 performs well in hospitalised patients, particularly in those classified as intermediate (RR 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.71 to 1.17) or high risk (RR 1.01, 95% CI = 0.87 to 1.16). In community settings, CRB-65 over-predicts the probability of 30-day mortality across all strata of predicted risk, low (RR 9.41, 95% CI = 1.75 to 50.66), intermediate (RR 4.84, 95% CI = 2.61 to 8.69), and high (RR 1.58, 95% CI = 0.59 to 4.19).

Conclusion: CRB-65 performs well in stratifying severity of pneumonia and resultant 30-day mortality in hospital settings. In community settings, CRB-65 appears to over-predict the probability of 30-day mortality across all strata of predicted risk. Caution is needed when applying CRB-65 to patients in general practice.

Citing Articles

The SpO/FiO Ratio Combined with Prognostic Scores for Pneumonia and COVID-19 Increases Their Accuracy in Predicting Mortality of COVID-19 Patients.

Zinna G, Pipito L, Colomba C, Scichilone N, Licata A, Barbagallo M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(19).

PMID: 39407943 PMC: 11478206. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13195884.

Prognostic factors and prediction models for hospitalisation and all-cause mortality in adults presenting to primary care with a lower respiratory tract infection: a systematic review.

Rijk M, Platteel T, van den Berg T, Geersing G, Little P, Rutten F BMJ Open. 2024; 14(3):e075475.

PMID: 38521534 PMC: 10961536. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075475.

Management and documentation of pneumonia - a comparison of patients consulting primary care and emergency care.

Arntsberg L, Fernberg S, Berger A, Hedin K, Moberg A Scand J Prim Health Care. 2024; 42(2):338-346.

PMID: 38459974 PMC: 11003321. DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2024.2326469.

Prognostic accuracy of eight triage scores in suspected COVID-19 in an Emergency Department low-income setting: An observational cohort study.

Marincowitz C, Hasan M, Omer Y, Hodkinson P, McAlpine D, Goodacre S Afr J Emerg Med. 2024; 14(1):51-57.

PMID: 38317781 PMC: 10839866. DOI: 10.1016/j.afjem.2023.12.004.

Identifying Existing Evidence to Potentially Develop a Machine Learning Diagnostic Algorithm for Cough in Primary Care Settings: Scoping Review.

Cummerow J, Wienecke C, Engler N, Marahrens P, Gruening P, Steinhauser J J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e46929.

PMID: 38096024 PMC: 10755665. DOI: 10.2196/46929.

References

. BTS Guidelines for the Management of Community Acquired Pneumonia in Adults. Thorax. 2001; 56 Suppl 4:IV1-64. PMC: 1765992. DOI: 10.1136/thorax.56.suppl_4.iv1. View

Espana P, Capelastegui A, Gorordo I, Esteban C, Oribe M, Ortega M . Development and validation of a clinical prediction rule for severe community-acquired pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006; 174(11):1249-56. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200602-177OC. View

Schuetz P, Koller M, Christ-Crain M, Steyerberg E, Stolz D, Muller C . Predicting mortality with pneumonia severity scores: importance of model recalibration to local settings. Epidemiol Infect. 2008; 136(12):1628-37. PMC: 2870789. DOI: 10.1017/S0950268808000435. View

Moons K, Royston P, Vergouwe Y, Grobbee D, Altman D . Prognosis and prognostic research: what, why, and how?. BMJ. 2009; 338:b375. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b375. View

Huang D, Weissfeld L, Kellum J, Yealy D, Kong L, Martino M . Risk prediction with procalcitonin and clinical rules in community-acquired pneumonia. Ann Emerg Med. 2008; 52(1):48-58.e2. PMC: 2775454. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.01.003. View

Buising K, Thursky K, Black J, MacGregor L, Street A, Kennedy M . A prospective comparison of severity scores for identifying patients with severe community acquired pneumonia: reconsidering what is meant by severe pneumonia. Thorax. 2006; 61(5):419-24. PMC: 2111174. DOI: 10.1136/thx.2005.051326. View

Buising K, Thursky K, Black J, MacGregor L, Street A, Kennedy M . Identifying severe community-acquired pneumonia in the emergency department: a simple clinical prediction tool. Emerg Med Australas. 2007; 19(5):418-26. DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2007.01003.x. View

Reilly B, Evans A . Translating clinical research into clinical practice: impact of using prediction rules to make decisions. Ann Intern Med. 2006; 144(3):201-9. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-3-200602070-00009. View

Ingui B, Rogers M . Searching for clinical prediction rules in MEDLINE. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001; 8(4):391-7. PMC: 130084. DOI: 10.1136/jamia.2001.0080391. View

10.

Kruger S, Ewig S, Marre R, Papassotiriou J, Richter K, von Baum H . Procalcitonin predicts patients at low risk of death from community-acquired pneumonia across all CRB-65 classes. Eur Respir J. 2007; 31(2):349-55. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00054507. View

11.

Falk G, Fahey T . C-reactive protein and community-acquired pneumonia in ambulatory care: systematic review of diagnostic accuracy studies. Fam Pract. 2008; 26(1):10-21. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmn095. View

12.

Capelastegui A, Espana P, Quintana J, Areitio I, Gorordo I, Egurrola M . Validation of a predictive rule for the management of community-acquired pneumonia. Eur Respir J. 2006; 27(1):151-7. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.06.00062505. View

13.

Hak E, Bont J, Hoes A, Verheij T . Prognostic factors for serious morbidity and mortality from community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections among the elderly in primary care. Fam Pract. 2005; 22(4):375-80. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmi020. View

14.

Zuberi F, Khan J . Prospective comparison of prediction rules of mortality risk for CAP in a developing country. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2008; 12(4):447-52. View

15.

Macfarlane J, Boldy D . 2004 update of BTS pneumonia guidelines: what's new?. Thorax. 2004; 59(5):364-6. PMC: 1747016. DOI: 10.1136/thx.2004.024992. View

16.

Mandell L, Wunderink R, Anzueto A, Bartlett J, Campbell G, Dean N . Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2007; 44 Suppl 2:S27-72. PMC: 7107997. DOI: 10.1086/511159. View

17.

Bont J, Hak E, Hoes A, Macfarlane J, Verheij T . Predicting death in elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a prospective validation study reevaluating the CRB-65 severity assessment tool. Arch Intern Med. 2008; 168(13):1465-8. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.168.13.1465. View

18.

Myint P, Kamath A, Vowler S, Maisey D, Harrison B . Severity assessment criteria recommended by the British Thoracic Society (BTS) for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and older patients. Should SOAR (systolic blood pressure, oxygenation, age and respiratory rate) criteria be used in older people?.... Age Ageing. 2006; 35(3):286-91. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afj081. View

19.

Bauer T, Ewig S, Marre R, Suttorp N, Welte T . CRB-65 predicts death from community-acquired pneumonia. J Intern Med. 2006; 260(1):93-101. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2006.01657.x. View

20.

McGinn T, Guyatt G, Wyer P, Naylor C, Stiell I, Richardson W . Users' guides to the medical literature: XXII: how to use articles about clinical decision rules. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 2000; 284(1):79-84. DOI: 10.1001/jama.284.1.79. View