» Articles » PMID: 20881025

Blind Subjects Implanted with the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis Are Able to Improve Performance in a Spatial-motor Task

Overview
Journal Br J Ophthalmol
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2010 Oct 1
PMID 20881025
Citations 89
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background/aims: To determine to what extent subjects implanted with the Argus II retinal prosthesis can improve performance compared with residual native vision in a spatial-motor task.

Methods: High-contrast square stimuli (5.85 cm sides) were displayed in random locations on a 19″ (48.3 cm) touch screen monitor located 12″ (30.5 cm) in front of the subject. Subjects were instructed to locate and touch the square centre with the system on and then off (40 trials each). The coordinates of the square centre and location touched were recorded.

Results: Ninety-six percent (26/27) of subjects showed a significant improvement in accuracy and 93% (25/27) show a significant improvement in repeatability with the system on compared with off (p<0.05, Student t test). A group of five subjects that had both accuracy and repeatability values <250 pixels (7.4 cm) with the system off (ie, using only their residual vision) was significantly more accurate and repeatable than the remainder of the cohort (p<0.01). Of this group, four subjects showed a significant improvement in both accuracy and repeatability with the system on.

Conclusion: In a study on the largest cohort of visual prosthesis recipients to date, we found that artificial vision augments information from existing vision in a spatial-motor task. Clinical trials registry no NCT00407602.

Citing Articles

Quantitative analyses of how optimally heterogeneous neural codes maximize neural information in jittery transmission environments.

Roh H, Kim S, Lee H, Im M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):29623.

PMID: 39609587 PMC: 11604997. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-81029-2.


A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: A Single-Arm Clinical Trial of Feasibility.

Petoe M, Abbott C, Titchener S, Kolic M, Kentler W, Nayagam D Ophthalmol Sci. 2024; 5(1):100525.

PMID: 39328823 PMC: 11426041. DOI: 10.1016/j.xops.2024.100525.


Noninvasive Ultrasound Retinal Stimulation for Vision Restoration at High Spatiotemporal Resolution.

Qian X, Lu G, Thomas B, Li R, Chen X, Shung K BME Front. 2023; 2022:9829316.

PMID: 37850175 PMC: 10521738. DOI: 10.34133/2022/9829316.


Electrically-evoked responses for retinal prostheses are differentially altered depending on ganglion cell types in outer retinal neurodegeneration caused by gene mutation.

Roh H, Otgondemberel Y, Eom J, Kim D, Im M Front Cell Neurosci. 2023; 17:1115703.

PMID: 36814867 PMC: 9939843. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2023.1115703.


Therapeutic landscape for inherited ocular diseases: Current and emerging therapies.

Chan H, Oh J, Leroy B Singapore Med J. 2023; 64(1):17-26.

PMID: 36722513 PMC: 9979805. DOI: 10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2022-179.


References
1.
Rizzo 3rd J, Wyatt J, Loewenstein J, Kelly S, Shire D . Perceptual efficacy of electrical stimulation of human retina with a microelectrode array during short-term surgical trials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003; 44(12):5362-9. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.02-0817. View

2.
Carlson S, Hyvarinen L, Raninen A . Persistent behavioural blindness after early visual deprivation and active visual rehabilitation: a case report. Br J Ophthalmol. 1986; 70(8):607-11. PMC: 1040782. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.70.8.607. View

3.
Caspi A, Dorn J, McClure K, Humayun M, Greenberg R, McMahon M . Feasibility study of a retinal prosthesis: spatial vision with a 16-electrode implant. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009; 127(4):398-401. DOI: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.20. View

4.
Stone J, Barlow W, Humayun M, de Juan Jr E, Milam A . Morphometric analysis of macular photoreceptors and ganglion cells in retinas with retinitis pigmentosa. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992; 110(11):1634-9. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1992.01080230134038. View

5.
Mahadevappa M, Weiland J, Yanai D, Fine I, Greenberg R, Humayun M . Perceptual thresholds and electrode impedance in three retinal prosthesis subjects. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2005; 13(2):201-6. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2005.848687. View