Are Biomarkers Additive to Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index for Severity Assessment in Normotensive Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism?

Background: Biomarkers and clinical prediction rules have been proposed for severity assessment in acute pulmonary embolism (PE).

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare biomarkers with the PE Severity Index (PESI), a validated scoring system for predicting 30-day mortality and to determine if addition of biomarkers to PESI would improve its predictive accuracy.

Study Design And Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of normotensive patients admitted with PE confirmed by CT pulmonary angiogram, to three teaching hospitals between January 2005 and July 2007. All patients had admission levels of D-dimer and Troponin I and calculation of PESI score on admission. The outcome of interest was 30-day mortality.

Results: There were 411 patients included in the study. Patients who died had higher levels of D-dimer (median 2947 ng/ml vs. 1464 ng/ml; P=0.02), Troponin (57.1% positive vs. 13.8%; P<0.0001) and higher PESI scores [median 109 vs. 83; P<0.0001], compared to survivors. PESI had superior accuracy for predicting 30-day mortality than a combination of Troponin and D-dimer (AUC 0.80 vs. 0.75). Addition of Troponin to PESI further improved the predictive value of the score (AUC 0.85 for vs. AUC 0.80 for PESI alone).

Conclusion: Biomarkers and clinical prediction rules predict outcome in acute PE. Addition of troponin to the PESI scoring system improves the predictive value for 30-day mortality and may be useful for guiding initial management of patients presenting with PE.