» Articles » PMID: 20860828

Changes in Cortical Cytoskeletal and Extracellular Matrix Gene Expression in Prostate Cancer Are Related to Oncogenic ERG Deregulation

Overview
Journal BMC Cancer
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Oncology
Date 2010 Sep 24
PMID 20860828
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The cortical cytoskeleton network connects the actin cytoskeleton to various membrane proteins, influencing cell adhesion, polarity, migration and response to extracellular signals. Previous studies have suggested changes in the expression of specific components in prostate cancer, especially of 4.1 proteins (encoded by EPB41 genes) which form nodes in this network.

Methods: Expression of EPB41L1, EPB41L2, EPB41L3 (protein: 4.1B), EPB41L4B (EHM2), EPB41L5, EPB49 (dematin), VIL2 (ezrin), and DLG1 (summarized as "cortical cytoskeleton" genes) as well as ERG was measured by quantitative RT-PCR in a well-characterized set of 45 M0 prostate adenocarcinoma and 13 benign tissues. Hypermethylation of EPB41L3 and GSTP1 was compared in 93 cancer tissues by methylation-specific PCR. Expression of 4.1B was further studied by immunohistochemistry.

Results: EPB41L1 and EPB41L3 were significantly downregulated and EPB41L4B was upregulated in cancer tissues. Low EPB41L1 or high EPB41L4B expression were associated with earlier biochemical recurrence. None of the other cortical cytoskeleton genes displayed expression changes, in particular EPB49 and VIL2, despite hints from previous studies. EPB41L3 downregulation was significantly associated with hypermethylation of its promoter and strongly correlated with GSTP1 hypermethylation. Protein 4.1B was detected most strongly in the basal cells of normal prostate epithelia. Its expression in carcinoma cells was similar to the weaker one in normal luminal cells. EPB41L3 downregulation and EPB41L4B upregulation were essentially restricted to the 22 cases with ERG overexpression. Expression changes in EPB41L3 and EPB41L4B closely paralleled those previously observed for the extracellular matrix genes FBLN1 and SPOCK1, respectively.

Conclusions: Specific changes in the cortical cytoskeleton were observed during prostate cancer progression. They parallel changes in the expression of extracellular matrix components and all together appear to be associated with oncogenic ERG overexpression. We hypothesize that these alterations may contribute to the increased invasivity conferred to prostate cancer cells by ERG deregulation.

Citing Articles

1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D Suppresses Prognostic Survival Biomarkers Associated with Cell Cycle and Actin Organization in a Non-Malignant African American Prostate Cell Line.

Johnson J, Martini R, Yuan Y, Woods-Burnham L, Walker M, Ortiz-Hernandez G Biology (Basel). 2024; 13(5).

PMID: 38785827 PMC: 11118023. DOI: 10.3390/biology13050346.


Extracellular cancer‑associated fibroblasts: A novel subgroup in the cervical cancer microenvironment that exhibits tumor‑promoting roles and prognosis biomarker functions.

Wang Y, Xu M, Yao Y, Li Y, Zhang S, Fu Y Oncol Lett. 2024; 27(4):167.

PMID: 38449793 PMC: 10915806. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2024.14300.


scTIGER: A Deep-Learning Method for Inferring Gene Regulatory Networks from Case versus Control scRNA-seq Datasets.

Dautle M, Zhang S, Chen Y Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(17).

PMID: 37686146 PMC: 10488287. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241713339.


Delineating the glioblastoma stemness by genes involved in cytoskeletal rearrangements and metabolic alterations.

Kaluzinska-Kolat Z, Kolat D, Kosla K, Pluciennik E, Bednarek A World J Stem Cells. 2023; 15(5):302-322.

PMID: 37342224 PMC: 10277965. DOI: 10.4252/wjsc.v15.i5.302.


Tumor Suppressor 4.1N/ is Epigenetic Silenced by Promoter Methylation and MiR-454-3p in NSCLC.

Yang Q, Zhu L, Ye M, Zhang B, Zhan P, Li H Front Genet. 2022; 13:805960.

PMID: 35795202 PMC: 9251189. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.805960.


References
1.
Carver B, Tran J, Gopalan A, Chen Z, Shaikh S, Carracedo A . Aberrant ERG expression cooperates with loss of PTEN to promote cancer progression in the prostate. Nat Genet. 2009; 41(5):619-24. PMC: 2835150. DOI: 10.1038/ng.370. View

2.
Chuan Y, Iglesias-Gato D, Fernandez-Perez L, Cedazo-Minguez A, Pang S, Norstedt G . Ezrin mediates c-Myc actions in prostate cancer cell invasion. Oncogene. 2009; 29(10):1531-42. DOI: 10.1038/onc.2009.442. View

3.
Brooks J, Weinstein M, Lin X, Sun Y, Pin S, Bova G . CG island methylation changes near the GSTP1 gene in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1998; 7(6):531-6. View

4.
Kumar-Sinha C, Tomlins S, Chinnaiyan A . Recurrent gene fusions in prostate cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008; 8(7):497-511. PMC: 2711688. DOI: 10.1038/nrc2402. View

5.
Wang J, Cai Y, Penland R, Chauhan S, Miesfeld R, Ittmann M . Increased expression of the metastasis-associated gene Ehm2 in prostate cancer. Prostate. 2006; 66(15):1641-52. DOI: 10.1002/pros.20474. View