» Articles » PMID: 20853153

Shortened Time Interval Between Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis and Risk Testing for Hereditary Colorectal Cancer is Not Related to Higher Psychological Distress

Overview
Journal Fam Cancer
Publisher Springer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2010 Sep 21
PMID 20853153
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Current diagnostic practices have shortened the interval between colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis and genetic analysis for Lynch syndrome by MSI-testing. We studied the relation of time between MSI-testing since CRC diagnosis (MSI-CRC interval) and psychological distress. We performed a cross-sectional study in 89 patients who had previously been treated for CRC. Data were collected during MSI-testing after genetic counseling. Psychological distress was measured with the IES, the SCL-90 and the POMS; social issues with the ISS, ISB and the ODHCF. The median time of MSI-CRC interval was 24 months (range 0-332), with 23% of the patients diagnosed less than 12 months and 42% more than 36 months prior to MSI-testing. In 34% of the patients cancer specific distress was high (IES scores >26). Mean psychopathology (SCL-90) scores were low, mean mood states (POMS) scores were moderate. Interval MSI-CRC was not related to psychological distress. High cancer specific distress was reported by 24% of patients diagnosed with CRC less than 12 months ago versus 39 and 35% by those diagnosed between 12 and 36 months and more than 36 months ago respectively. Distress was positively related to female gender (P = 0.04), religiousness (P = 0.01), low social support (P = 0.02) and difficulties with family communication (P < 0.001). Shortened time interval between CRC diagnosis and MSI-testing is not associated with higher psychological distress. Females, religious persons, those having low social support and those reporting difficulties communicating hereditary colorectal cancer with relatives are at higher risk for psychological distress.

Citing Articles

Patients' Knowledge, Beliefs, and Distress Associated with Detection and Evaluation of Incidental Pulmonary Nodules for Cancer: Results from a Multicenter Survey.

Freiman M, Clark J, Slatore C, Gould M, Woloshin S, Schwartz L J Thorac Oncol. 2016; 11(5):700-708.

PMID: 26961390 PMC: 4851914. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.01.018.


More breast cancer patients prefer BRCA-mutation testing without prior face-to-face genetic counseling.

Sie A, van Zelst-Stams W, Spruijt L, Mensenkamp A, Ligtenberg M, Brunner H Fam Cancer. 2013; 13(2):143-51.

PMID: 24068317 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-013-9686-z.


DNA-testing for BRCA1/2 prior to genetic counselling in patients with breast cancer: design of an intervention study, DNA-direct.

Sie A, Spruijt L, van Zelst-Stams W, Mensenkamp A, Ligtenberg M, Brunner H BMC Womens Health. 2012; 12:12.

PMID: 22569005 PMC: 3416735. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6874-12-12.


Psychological distress in newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients following microsatellite instability testing for Lynch syndrome on the pathologist's initiative.

Landsbergen K, Prins J, Brunner H, van Duijvendijk P, Nagengast F, van Krieken J Fam Cancer. 2012; 11(2):259-67.

PMID: 22311584 PMC: 3365237. DOI: 10.1007/s10689-012-9510-1.

References
1.
Thewes B, Meiser B, Hickie I . Psychometric properties of the Impact of Event Scale amongst women at increased risk for hereditary breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2001; 10(6):459-68. DOI: 10.1002/pon.533. View

2.
Vasen H, Moslein G, Alonso A, Bernstein I, Bertario L, Blanco I . Guidelines for the clinical management of Lynch syndrome (hereditary non-polyposis cancer). J Med Genet. 2007; 44(6):353-62. PMC: 2740877. DOI: 10.1136/jmg.2007.048991. View

3.
van Oostrom I, Meijers-Heijboer H, Duivenvoorden H, Brocker-Vriends A, van Asperen C, Sijmons R . The common sense model of self-regulation and psychological adjustment to predictive genetic testing: a prospective study. Psychooncology. 2007; 16(12):1121-9. DOI: 10.1002/pon.1178. View

4.
Baker F, Denniston M, Zabora J, Polland A, Dudley W . A POMS short form for cancer patients: psychometric and structural evaluation. Psychooncology. 2002; 11(4):273-81. DOI: 10.1002/pon.564. View

5.
Bjorvatn C, Eide G, Hanestad B, Hamang A, Havik O . Intrusion and avoidance in subjects undergoing genetic investigation and counseling for hereditary cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2009; 17(11):1371-81. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-009-0594-6. View