» Articles » PMID: 2083540

Comparative Study of the Performances of X-ray and Gadolinium 153 Bone Densitometers at the Level of the Spine, Femoral Neck and Femoral Shaft

Overview
Journal Eur J Nucl Med
Specialty Nuclear Medicine
Date 1990 Jan 1
PMID 2083540
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We investigated the precision of gadolinium 153 dual photon absorptiometry (DPA) and quantitative digital radiography (QDR) bone densitometers by determining in vitro and in vivo coefficients of variation (CV) of bone mineral density (BMD). In vitro, the long-term CV of spine phantom BMD measured weekly for 40 weeks was 1.2% and 0.7% for DPA and QDR, respectively. Stimulating soft-tissue thickness with water, the CV of 6 repeat measurements of spine phantom at depths from 0 to 27 cm in 1 cm steps (a total of 168 measurements) increased from 0.1% at 0 cm of water to 2.5% at 27 cm for DPA, and from 0.2% at 0 cm to 1.4% at 27 cm for QDR; mean CV of the 28 series (0-27 cm) was higher for DPA (1.2% +/- 0.8%, mean +/- SD) than for QDR (0.7% +/- 0.6%; P less than 0.001). With the hip phantom, femoral neck BMD was determined, and the CV was also dependent on water thickness; mean CV of the 20 series (0-10 cm) was 2.1% +/- 1.2% for DPA and 1.3% +/- 0.9% for QDR (not significant). In vivo, at the spine level, with DPA, mean CV of BMD measured 6 times after repositioning in 6 healthy volunteers was 3.8% +/- 1.9% and 2.1% +/- 0.7% with 153 Gd activity of 0.46 Ci and 1 Ci, respectively (BMD range: 0.796-1.247 g/cm2, no significant difference between the two groups).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Citing Articles

Current methods and advances in bone densitometry.

Guglielmi G, Gluer C, Majumdar S, Blunt B, Genant H Eur Radiol. 1995; 5(2):129-39.

PMID: 11539928


Broadband ultrasound attenuation compared with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in screening for postmenopausal low bone density.

Young H, Howey S, Purdie D Osteoporos Int. 1993; 3(3):160-4.

PMID: 8481593 DOI: 10.1007/BF01623278.


Variation in spinal and femoral bone mass gain, energy and calcium intake during adolescence.

Bonjour J, Theintz G, Buchs B, Slosman D, Clavien H, Rizzoli R Osteoporos Int. 1993; 3 Suppl 1:67-8.

PMID: 8461580 DOI: 10.1007/BF01621867.


Relationship between bone mineral density and dietary intakes in the elderly.

Geinoz G, Rapin C, Rizzoli R, Kraemer R, Buchs B, Slosman D Osteoporos Int. 1993; 3(5):242-8.

PMID: 8400605 DOI: 10.1007/BF01623827.


Influence of patient's weight on dual-photon absorptiometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of bone mineral density.

MARTIN P, Verhas M, Als C, Geerts L, Paternot J, Bergmann P Osteoporos Int. 1993; 3(4):198-203.

PMID: 8338975 DOI: 10.1007/BF01623676.


References
1.
Pouilles J, Tremollieres F, LOUVET J, Fournie B, Morlock G, Ribot C . Sensitivity of dual-photon absorptiometry in spinal osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int. 1988; 43(6):329-34. DOI: 10.1007/BF02553274. View

2.
Wahner H, Dunn W, Brown M, Morin R, Riggs B . Comparison of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and dual photon absorptiometry for bone mineral measurements of the lumbar spine. Mayo Clin Proc. 1988; 63(11):1075-84. DOI: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)65502-5. View

3.
Dawson-Hughes B, Deehr M, Berger P, Dallal G, Sadowski L . Correction of the effects of source, source strength, and soft-tissue thickness on spine dual-photon absorptiometry measurements. Calcif Tissue Int. 1989; 44(4):251-7. DOI: 10.1007/BF02553759. View

4.
Braillon P, Duboeuf F, Meary M, Barret P, Delmas P, Meunier P . [Measurement of bone mineral content by quantitative digital radiography. First results in the lumbar vertebrae]. Presse Med. 1989; 18(21):1062-5. View

5.
Wilson C, Madsen M . Dichromatic absorptiometry of vertebral bone mineral content. Invest Radiol. 1977; 12(2):180-4. DOI: 10.1097/00004424-197703000-00014. View