» Articles » PMID: 2083516

Cefotaxime. An Update of Its Pharmacology and Therapeutic Use

Overview
Journal Drugs
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1990 Oct 1
PMID 2083516
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cefotaxime was the first 'third generation' cephalosporin to be marketed and is administered intramuscularly or intravenously. Similar to other agents of this class, it has a broad spectrum of in vitro activity, particularly against Enterobacteriaceae, including beta-lactamase-producing strains. Cefotaxime forms a metabolite, desacetylcefotaxime, which is antibacterially effective against many bacteria per se and acts additively or synergistically with cefotaxime against many strains. Since the first review of cefotaxime in the Journal, further studies have confirmed its value in the treatment of various infections: complicated urinary tract infections, lower respiratory tract infections, bacteraemia, meningitis, uncomplicated gonorrhoea, infections of skin and soft tissue and of bone and joints, and obstetric and gynaecological infections. Cefotaxime is effective as an empirical treatment of suspected infection due to susceptible organisms in immunocompromised patients and is of proven efficacy in serious, life-threatening infections in general. Cefotaxime reduces the incidence of postsurgical infection but the role of third generation cephalosporins in prophylaxis remains to be determined. The indications for which cefotaxime and other 'third generation' cephalosporins would be considered the most appropriate therapy remain largely dependent upon such factors as varied as cost, local medical custom, decisions of regulatory agencies and geographical patterns of bacterial resistance. Cefotaxime nevertheless represents a valuable 'third generation' cephalosporin of great clinical value in certain infectious conditions, in particular those which are serious and life-threatening and where resistance to therapies is creating a clinical problem.

Citing Articles

Short, extended and continuous infusion of β-lactams: predicted impact on target attainment and risk for toxicity in an ICU patient cohort.

Smekal A, Swartling M, Furebring M, Giske C, Jonsson S, Lipcsey M J Antimicrob Chemother. 2025; 80(3):876-884.

PMID: 39847494 PMC: 11879237. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkaf013.


Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model of Cefotaxime in Patients with Impaired Renal Function.

Zbib F, Deschamps A, Velly L, Blin O, Guilhaumou R, Gattacceca F Clin Pharmacokinet. 2025; 64(2):257-273.

PMID: 39762592 DOI: 10.1007/s40262-024-01469-x.


Cefotaxime Versus Ceftriaxone: A Comprehensive Comparative Review.

Sharma B, Chalikwar R, Bhalerao S, Gondane A, Pawar D, Sharma A Cureus. 2024; 16(9):e69146.

PMID: 39398799 PMC: 11467699. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.69146.


Towards Antibiotic Synthesis in Continuous-Flow Processes.

Comito M, Monguzzi R, Tagliapietra S, Palmisano G, Cravotto G Molecules. 2023; 28(3).

PMID: 36771086 PMC: 9919330. DOI: 10.3390/molecules28031421.


Population pharmacokinetics of cefotaxime in intensive care patients.

Swartling M, Smekal A, Furebring M, Lipcsey M, Jonsson S, Nielsen E Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2021; 78(2):251-258.

PMID: 34596726 PMC: 8748331. DOI: 10.1007/s00228-021-03218-6.


References
1.
Plummer F, Maggwa N, DCosta L, Nsanze H, Karasira P, Maclean I . Cefotaxime treatment of Haemophilus ducreyi infection in Kenya. Sex Transm Dis. 1984; 11(4):304-7. DOI: 10.1097/00007435-198410000-00008. View

2.
Golledge C, McKenzie T, Riley T . Extended spectrum cephalosporins and Clostridium difficile. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1989; 23(6):929-31. DOI: 10.1093/jac/23.6.929. View

3.
Guggenbichler J, Allerberger F, Dierich M . Influence of cephalosporines III generation with varying biliary excretion on fecal flora and emergence of resistant bacteria during and after cessation of therapy. Padiatr Padol. 1986; 21(4):335-42. View

4.
Piccinno A, Pagliarulo A . Cefotaxime for the treatment of gram-positive urinary tract infection. Infection. 1985; 13 Suppl 1:S100-2. DOI: 10.1007/BF01644228. View

5.
Hassler D, Zoller L, Haude M, Hufnagel H, Heinrich F, Sonntag H . Cefotaxime versus penicillin in the late stage of Lyme disease--prospective, randomized therapeutic study. Infection. 1990; 18(1):16-20. DOI: 10.1007/BF01644175. View