An Evaluation of HERG Current Assay Performance: Translating Preclinical Safety Studies to Clinical QT Prolongation
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Block of delayed rectifier current (I(Kr), Kv11.1 encoding the hERG gene) is associated with delayed cardiac repolarization (QTc prolongation), a surrogate marker of proarrhythmia. Despite its recognized role in assessing QTc prolongation risk, a quantitative analysis of the utility and limitations of the hERG current assay has not been reported. To benchmark hERG assay performance, this retrospective study compared hERG block potency with drug-induced QTc prolongation assessed during rigorous thorough QT (TQT) clinical studies for 39 drugs from multiple classes. To place block in context, hERG safety margins (IC(50) values for block/mean maximal plasma drug concentrations during TQT studies) were compared to QTc prolongation (QTc increase≥5ms). Most (9/10) drugs eliciting essentially no hERG block at maximal concentrations demonstrate no QTc prolongation despite representing a wide hERG safety margin range. Based on receiver-operator characteristics, a hERG safety margin of 45 provided optimal overall performance linking safety margins to QTc prolongation (sensitivity (true positive rate)=0.64, specificity (true negative rate)=0.88); the area under the receiver-operator curve (0.72) is indicative of moderate overall concordance. Likelihood ratios calculated from multitier contingency tables suggest that QTc prolonging drugs are only 5-7 times as likely to demonstrate low safety margins (1-30 range) compared to drugs that do not prolong QTc. Paradoxically, higher safety margins demonstrate lesser confidence predicting prolongation. The overall limitations of hERG safety margins shown using these quantitative, evidence-based approaches highlight the need for additional preclinical assays and adaptive strategies throughout drug discovery to reliably mitigate QTc prolongation risk.
Obesity Arrhythmias: Role of IL-6 Trans-Signaling.
Aromolaran K, Corbin A, Aromolaran A Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(15).
PMID: 39125976 PMC: 11313575. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25158407.
Daley M, Moreau M, Bronk P, Fisher J, Kofron C, Mende U Toxicol Sci. 2024; 201(1):145-157.
PMID: 38897660 PMC: 11347779. DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfae079.
Lin H, Rusyn I, Chiu W ALTEX. 2023; 41(1):37-49.
PMID: 37921411 PMC: 10898275. DOI: 10.14573/altex.2306231.
Biomimetic Cardiac Tissue Models for In Vitro Arrhythmia Studies.
Aitova A, Berezhnoy A, Tsvelaya V, Gusev O, Lyundup A, Efimov A Biomimetics (Basel). 2023; 8(6).
PMID: 37887618 PMC: 10604593. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics8060487.
Pan Z, Liang P Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2023; 281:209-233.
PMID: 37421443 DOI: 10.1007/164_2023_663.