» Articles » PMID: 20804570

Breast Cancer Prognostic Classification in the Molecular Era: the Role of Histological Grade

Abstract

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with varied morphological appearances, molecular features, behavior, and response to therapy. Current routine clinical management of breast cancer relies on the availability of robust clinical and pathological prognostic and predictive factors to support clinical and patient decision making in which potentially suitable treatment options are increasingly available. One of the best-established prognostic factors in breast cancer is histological grade, which represents the morphological assessment of tumor biological characteristics and has been shown to be able to generate important information related to the clinical behavior of breast cancers. Genome-wide microarray-based expression profiling studies have unraveled several characteristics of breast cancer biology and have provided further evidence that the biological features captured by histological grade are important in determining tumor behavior. Also, expression profiling studies have generated clinically useful data that have significantly improved our understanding of the biology of breast cancer, and these studies are undergoing evaluation as improved prognostic and predictive tools in clinical practice. Clinical acceptance of these molecular assays will require them to be more than expensive surrogates of established traditional factors such as histological grade. It is essential that they provide additional prognostic or predictive information above and beyond that offered by current parameters. Here, we present an analysis of the validity of histological grade as a prognostic factor and a consensus view on the significance of histological grade and its role in breast cancer classification and staging systems in this era of emerging clinical use of molecular classifiers.

Citing Articles

Deep learning-based multi-task prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using multiscale whole slide images in breast cancer: A multicenter study.

Wang Q, Zhao F, Zhang H, Chu T, Wang Q, Pan X Chin J Cancer Res. 2025; 37(1):28-47.

PMID: 40078559 PMC: 11893347. DOI: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2025.01.03.


The Five-Year Outcomes of Breast Cancer Surgical Management at the Colentina Surgical Clinic, Bucharest, Romania: A Descriptive Retrospective Analysis Between 2019 and 2023.

Botezatu C, Costea D, Nichilo M, Lazar A, Andras D, Radu M Life (Basel). 2025; 15(1).

PMID: 39860032 PMC: 11767138. DOI: 10.3390/life15010092.


Exploration of plasma tryptophan levels along with Ki-67 expression binomial investigation for forecasting tumor aggressiveness within invasive ductal breast cancer.

Salmi T, Ameur D, Dali-Sahi M, Dib J, Amraoui N, Kachekouche Y J Mol Histol. 2024; 56(1):52.

PMID: 39708255 DOI: 10.1007/s10735-024-10333-y.


Aptamer Proteolysis-Targeting Chimeras (PROTACs): A Novel Strategy to Combat Drug Resistance in Estrogen Receptor α-Positive Breast Cancer.

Feng Y, Zhang Z, Zhang H, Guo H, Tan C, Xu N ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. 2024; 7(12):3945-3954.

PMID: 39698261 PMC: 11650730. DOI: 10.1021/acsptsci.4c00469.


Impact of prolactin treatment on enhancing the cellular responses of MCF7 breast cancer cells to tamoxifen treatment.

Shams A Discov Oncol. 2024; 15(1):797.

PMID: 39692941 PMC: 11655925. DOI: 10.1007/s12672-024-01701-x.


References
1.
Balslev I, Axelsson C, Zedeler K, Rasmussen B, Carstensen B, Mouridsen H . The Nottingham Prognostic Index applied to 9,149 patients from the studies of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1994; 32(3):281-90. DOI: 10.1007/BF00666005. View

2.
Henson D, Ries L, Freedman L, Carriaga M . Relationship among outcome, stage of disease, and histologic grade for 22,616 cases of breast cancer. The basis for a prognostic index. Cancer. 1991; 68(10):2142-9. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19911115)68:10<2142::aid-cncr2820681010>3.0.co;2-d. View

3.
Williams C, Brunskill S, Altman D, Briggs A, Campbell H, Clarke M . Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy. Health Technol Assess. 2006; 10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. DOI: 10.3310/hta10340. View

4.
Sundquist M, Thorstenson S, Brudin L, Nordenskjold B . Applying the Nottingham Prognostic Index to a Swedish breast cancer population. South East Swedish Breast Cancer Study Group. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1999; 53(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1023/a:1006052115874. View

5.
Rivadeneira D, Simmons R, Christos P, Hanna K, Daly J, Osborne M . Predictive factors associated with axillary lymph node metastases in T1a and T1b breast carcinomas: analysis in more than 900 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2000; 191(1):1-6; discussion 6-8. DOI: 10.1016/s1072-7515(00)00310-0. View