» Articles » PMID: 20728709

Prospective, Randomized Single-blind Study of the Anesthetic Efficacy of 1.8 and 3.6 Milliliters of 2% Lidocaine with 1:50,000 Epinephrine for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block

Overview
Journal J Endod
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2010 Aug 24
PMID 20728709
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this prospective, randomized study was to compare the degree of pulpal anesthesia obtained in vital, asymptomatic teeth by using 1.8 mL and 3.6 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:50,000 epinephrine compared with 1.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine for inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) block.

Methods: Thirty adult subjects randomly received IAN blocks of 1.8 mL and 3.6 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:50,000 epinephrine and 1.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine at 3 separate appointments in a crossover design. An electric pulp tester was used to test for anesthesia in 3-minute cycles for 60 minutes of the first molars, first premolars, and lateral incisors. Anesthesia was considered successful when 2 consecutive 80 readings were obtained within 15 minutes, and the 80 reading was continuously sustained through the 60th minute.

Results: By using 1.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:50,000 epinephrine, successful pulpal anesthesia ranged from 33%-50%, and when using 3.6 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:50,000 epinephrine, success ranged from 40%-60%. When using 1.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, success ranged from 40%-60%, with no significant difference among the 3 anesthetic formulations.

Conclusion: Increasing the epinephrine concentration to 1:50,000 epinephrine or increasing the volume to 3.6 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:50,000 epinephrine did not result in more successful pulpal anesthesia when compared with 1.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine by using the IAN block.

Citing Articles

Management Protocols of the Hot Tooth-A KAP Survey among General Dentists and Endodontists.

Ramachandran A, Khan S, Siddeeqh S, Gopinathan P, Bijai L, Iyer K J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023; 15(Suppl 1):S383-S390.

PMID: 37654287 PMC: 10466530. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_99_23.


Physiology of pregnancy and oral local anesthesia considerations.

Zhou X, Zhong Y, Pan Z, Zhang J, Pan J PeerJ. 2023; 11:e15585.

PMID: 37404472 PMC: 10315135. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15585.


The impact of cigarette smoking on the efficiency of local anesthesia during simple tooth extraction.

Al-Noori N, Ibraheem N, Abdulmunem M Saudi Dent J. 2021; 33(7):674-678.

PMID: 34803318 PMC: 8589589. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.04.011.


Anesthetic efficacy in vital asymptomatic teeth using different local anesthetics: a systematic review with network meta-analysis.

Liew A, Yeh Y, Abdullah D, Tu Y Restor Dent Endod. 2021; 46(3):e41.

PMID: 34513647 PMC: 8411002. DOI: 10.5395/rde.2021.46.e41.


Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of 1.8 mL and 3.6 mL of articaine in irreversible pulpitis of the mandibular molar: A randomized clinical trial.

Silva S, Tempestini Horliana A, Pannuti C, Braz-Silva P, Bispo C, Buscariolo I PLoS One. 2019; 14(7):e0219536.

PMID: 31365529 PMC: 6668778. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219536.