» Articles » PMID: 20693389

Influence of Contingency Awareness on Neural, Electrodermal and Evaluative Responses During Fear Conditioning

Overview
Date 2010 Aug 10
PMID 20693389
Citations 49
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In an fMRI study, effects of contingency awareness on conditioned responses were assessed in three groups comprising 118 subjects. A differential fear-conditioning paradigm with visual conditioned stimuli, an electrical unconditioned stimulus and two distractors was applied. The instructed aware group was informed about the contingencies, whereas the distractors prevented contingency detection in the unaware group. The third group (learned aware) was not informed about the contingencies, but learned them despite the distractors. Main effects of contingency awareness on conditioned responses emerged in several brain structures. Post hoc tests revealed differential dorsal anterior cingulate, insula and ventral striatum responses in aware conditioning only, whereas the amygdala was activated independent of contingency awareness. Differential responses of the hippocampus were specifically observed in learned aware subjects, indicating a role in the development of contingency awareness. The orbitofrontal cortex showed varying response patterns: lateral structures showed higher responses in instructed aware than unaware subjects, the opposite was true for medial parts. Conditioned subjective and electrodermal responses emerged only in the two aware groups. These results confirm the independence of conditioned amygdala responses from contingency awareness and indicate specific neural circuits for different aspects of fear acquisition in unaware, learned aware and instructed aware subjects.

Citing Articles

Resistance to Extinction of Evaluative Fear Conditioning in Delusion Proneness.

Louzolo A, Lebedev A, Bjornsdotter M, Acar K, Ahrends C, Kringelbach M Schizophr Bull Open. 2024; 3(1):sgac033.

PMID: 39144763 PMC: 11205979. DOI: 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgac033.


An externally validated resting-state brain connectivity signature of pain-related learning.

Kincses B, Forkmann K, Schlitt F, Pawlik R, Schmidt K, Timmann D Commun Biol. 2024; 7(1):875.

PMID: 39020002 PMC: 11255216. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-06574-y.


The relation between implicit statistical learning and proactivity as revealed by EEG.

Sznabel D, Land R, Kopp B, Kral A Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):15787.

PMID: 37737452 PMC: 10516964. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-42116-y.


Resolving the Delusion Paradox.

Petrovic P, Sterzer P Schizophr Bull. 2023; 49(6):1425-1436.

PMID: 37478890 PMC: 10686356. DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbad084.


Effects of Experiencing CS-US Pairings on Instructed Fear Reversal.

Wisniewski D, Braem S, Gonzalez-Garcia C, De Houwer J, Brass M J Neurosci. 2023; 43(30):5546-5558.

PMID: 37414559 PMC: 10376932. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0665-22.2023.


References
1.
Downar J, Crawley A, Mikulis D, Davis K . A multimodal cortical network for the detection of changes in the sensory environment. Nat Neurosci. 2000; 3(3):277-83. DOI: 10.1038/72991. View

2.
Sehlmeyer C, Schoning S, Zwitserlood P, Pfleiderer B, Kircher T, Arolt V . Human fear conditioning and extinction in neuroimaging: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2009; 4(6):e5865. PMC: 2692002. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005865. View

3.
Domjan M . Pavlovian conditioning: a functional perspective. Annu Rev Psychol. 2005; 56:179-206. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141409. View

4.
Hamm A, Vaitl D . Affective learning: awareness and aversion. Psychophysiology. 1996; 33(6):698-710. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1996.tb02366.x. View

5.
Pessoa L, McKenna M, Gutierrez E, Ungerleider L . Neural processing of emotional faces requires attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99(17):11458-63. PMC: 123278. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.172403899. View