» Articles » PMID: 33046817

Observational Learning of Fear in Real Time Procedure

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2020 Oct 13
PMID 33046817
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Learning to avoid threats often occurs by observing others. Most previous research on observational fear learning (OFL) in humans has used pre-recorded standardized video of an actor and thus lacked ecological validity. Here, we aimed to enhance ecological validity of the OFL by engaging participants in a real-time observational procedure (35 pairs of healthy male friends, age 18-27). One of the participants watched the other undergo a differential fear conditioning task, in which a conditioned stimulus (CS+) was paired with an aversive electric shock and another stimulus (CS-) was always safe. Subsequently, the CS+ and CS- were presented to the observer to test the OFL. While the friend's reactions to the shock elicited strong skin conductance responses (SCR) in all observers, subsequent differential SCRs (CS+ > CS-) were found only when declarative knowledge of the CS+/US contingency (rated by the participants) was acquired. Contingency-aware observers also showed elevated fear potentiated startle responses during both CS+ and CS- compared to baseline. We conclude that our real-time procedure can be effectively used to study OFL. The procedure allowed for dissecting two components of the OFL: an automatic emotional reaction to the response of the demonstrator and learning about stimulus contingency.

Citing Articles

Understanding Others' Distress Through Past Experiences: The Role of Memory Engram Cells in Observational Fear.

Kitamura T, Ramesh K, Terranova J Adv Neurobiol. 2024; 38:215-234.

PMID: 39008018 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-62983-9_12.


Rats respond to aversive emotional arousal of human handlers with the activation of the basolateral and central amygdala.

Kazmierowska A, Kostecki M, Szczepanik M, Nikolaev T, Hamed A, Michalowski J Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023; 120(46):e2302655120.

PMID: 37934822 PMC: 10655214. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2302655120.


Social network sites as learning environments and their implications for mental health.

Hussenoeder F Front Digit Health. 2022; 4:939740.

PMID: 36300130 PMC: 9589159. DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.939740.


Learning via instructions about observations: exploring similarities and differences with learning via actual observations.

Kasran S, Hughes S, De Houwer J R Soc Open Sci. 2022; 9(3):220059.

PMID: 35360350 PMC: 8965423. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.220059.


Watch and Learn: Vicarious Threat Learning across Human Development.

Skversky-Blocq Y, Haaker J, Shechner T Brain Sci. 2021; 11(10).

PMID: 34679409 PMC: 8533719. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11101345.

References
1.
Preston S, de Waal F . Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behav Brain Sci. 2003; 25(1):1-20; discussion 20-71. DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x02000018. View

2.
Huber A, Barber A, Farago T, Muller C, Huber L . Investigating emotional contagion in dogs (Canis familiaris) to emotional sounds of humans and conspecifics. Anim Cogn. 2017; 20(4):703-715. PMC: 5486498. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-017-1092-8. View

3.
Adriaense J, Martin J, Schiestl M, Lamm C, Bugnyar T . Negative emotional contagion and cognitive bias in common ravens (). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019; 116(23):11547-11552. PMC: 6561263. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1817066116. View

4.
Mineka S, Davidson M, Cook M, Keir R . Observational conditioning of snake fear in rhesus monkeys. J Abnorm Psychol. 1984; 93(4):355-72. DOI: 10.1037//0021-843x.93.4.355. View

5.
Knapska E, Nikolaev E, Boguszewski P, Walasek G, Blaszczyk J, Kaczmarek L . Between-subject transfer of emotional information evokes specific pattern of amygdala activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(10):3858-62. PMC: 1533786. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0511302103. View