» Articles » PMID: 38734503

Attitudes and Barriers Toward Video Visits in Surgical Care: Insights from a Nationwide Survey Among Surgeons

Overview
Journal Surgery
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2024 May 11
PMID 38734503
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Surgeons rapidly adopted video visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, video visit use among surgeons has significantly declined, pointing to the need to better understand current attitudes and barriers to their use in surgical care.

Methods: From August 2022 to March 2023, a nationwide survey was conducted among practicing surgeons in 6 specialties. The survey included multiple-choice and free-response questions based on an implementation determinants framework, covering demographics, provider, patient, and organizational factors.

Results: A total of 170 surgeons responded (24% response rate). Overall, 67% of surgeons said their practice lacked motivation for video visit implementation. Additionally, 69% disagreed with using video visits as the sole means for preoperative surgical consultation, even with relevant medical history, labs, and imaging. Nearly 43% cited the need for a physical examination, whereas 58% of surgeons said video visits carried a greater malpractice risk than in-person visits. Other barriers included technological limitations, billing, and care quality concerns. Nevertheless, 41% agreed that video visits could improve outcomes for some patients, and 60% expressed openness to using video visits exclusively for postoperative consultations in uncomplicated surgeries.

Conclusion: Surgeons recognize the potential benefits of video visits for certain patients. However, perceived barriers include the need for a physical examination, technological limitations, care quality concerns, and malpractice risks.

References
1.
Yao L, Fleshner P, Zaghiyan K . Impact of postoperative telemedicine visit versus in-person visit on patient satisfaction: A randomized clinical trial. Surgery. 2022; 173(2):322-327. PMC: 9659327. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.09.036. View

2.
Belarmino A, Walsh R, Alshak M, Patel N, Wu R, Hu J . Feasibility of a Mobile Health Application To Monitor Recovery and Patient-reported Outcomes after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol Oncol. 2019; 2(4):425-428. DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.08.016. View

3.
Eyrich N, Andino J, Ukavwe R, Farha M, Patel A, Triner D . The Lack of a Physical Exam During New Patient Telehealth Visits Does Not Impact Plans for Office and Operating Room Procedures. Urology. 2022; 167:109-114. PMC: 9313530. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.06.017. View

4.
Breton M, Sullivan E, Deville-Stoetzel N, McKinstry D, DePuccio M, Sriharan A . Telehealth challenges during COVID-19 as reported by primary healthcare physicians in Quebec and Massachusetts. BMC Fam Pract. 2021; 22(1):192. PMC: 8467009. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-021-01543-4. View

5.
Viers B, Lightner D, Rivera M, Tollefson M, Boorjian S, Karnes R . Efficiency, satisfaction, and costs for remote video visits following radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Eur Urol. 2015; 68(4):729-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.002. View